IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/isacfm/v5y1996i2p87-99.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identifying Tiers of Influence in Artificial Intelligence Research: I

Author

Listed:
  • Clyde W. Holsapple
  • Anita Lee

Abstract

As a step in the direction of helping researchers, students, and developers to stay abreast of ongoing research work in the field of artificial intelligence (AI) in general, and expert systems (ES) in particular, we have conducted a large‐scale citation analysis to identify the most influential journals for AI/ES research. We use a multifaceted methodology for assessing journal influence (i.e. quality and relevance). The methodology assesses each cited journals from two sets of base journals on several dimensions: breadth of recognition, consistency of recognition, trend of recognition, and intensity of recognition. Here, in Part I, we describe how these assessments are established objectively via data collected from base journals with a general AI focus. Part II will extend the set of base journals to include those that are devoted to expert systems (ES) research. The main results are tiers and a ranking that identify the most influential, important journals publishing AI/ES research.

Suggested Citation

  • Clyde W. Holsapple & Anita Lee, 1996. "Identifying Tiers of Influence in Artificial Intelligence Research: I," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 5(2), pages 87-99, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:isacfm:v:5:y:1996:i:2:p:87-99
    DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1174(199606)5:23.0.CO;2-E
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1174(199606)5:23.0.CO;2-E
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1174(199606)5:23.0.CO;2-E?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. B. C. Peritz, 1992. "On the objectives of citation analysis: Problems of theory and method," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 43(6), pages 448-451, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chiara Franzoni & Christopher L. Simpkins & Baoli Li & Ashwin Ram, 2010. "Using content analysis to investigate the research paths chosen by scientists over time," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 83(1), pages 321-335, April.
    2. Mario Calderini & Chiara Franzoni, 2004. "Is academic patenting detrimental to high quality research? An empirical analysis of the relationship between scientific careers and patent applications," KITeS Working Papers 162, KITeS, Centre for Knowledge, Internationalization and Technology Studies, Universita' Bocconi, Milano, Italy, revised Oct 2004.
    3. Marcelo Alves Ramos & Joabe Gomes Melo & Ulysses Paulino Albuquerque, 2012. "Citation behavior in popular scientific papers: what is behind obscure citations? The case of ethnobotany," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 92(3), pages 711-719, September.
    4. Rodriguez, Victor & Janssens, Frizo & Debackere, Koenraad & De Moor, Bart, 2008. "On material transfer agreements and visibility of researchers in biotechnology," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 2(1), pages 89-100.
    5. Collins C Ngwakwe, 2022. "The Relationship between Water/Energy Reduction and Shareholders' Dividend Yield," Oblik i finansi, Institute of Accounting and Finance, issue 3, pages 56-61, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:isacfm:v:5:y:1996:i:2:p:87-99. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/1099-1174/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.