Author
Listed:
- Ranjit Kumar Paul
- Md Yeasin
- C. Tamilselvi
- A. K. Paul
- Purushottam Sharma
- Pratap S. Birthal
Abstract
Forecasting agricultural commodity prices has been a long‐standing challenge for researchers and policymakers. The diverse behaviors exhibited by price of different commodities, ranging from the high volatility, nonlinearity, and complexity of vegetables to the lower volatility and linear patterns of cereals. This different pattern necessitates the use of data‐driven models to more precisely capture this complex behavior. This study aims to examine the efficiency of deep learning models in handling various types of price datasets. Three deep learning models, namely, gated recurrent unit (GRU), long short‐term memory (LSTM), and recurrent neural network (RNN), are employed and compared against benchmark models including random walk with drift, autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA), artificial neural networks (ANN), and support vector regression (SVR). The monthly wholesale price data during January 2010 to December 2022 for 19 agricultural commodities across 143 markets in India have been utilized to illustrate the performance of models. Empirical comparison has been carried out by using different accuracy measures. The predictive accuracy is the highest for less‐volatile crops such as cereals and pulses, while it is comparatively lower for crops with high‐volatility like vegetables. The significant difference in prediction accuracy of different models has also been investigated with the help of Diebold Mariano test and its multivariate version. The study concluded that deep learning techniques outperformed machine learning and stochastic models across a wide range of commodities.
Suggested Citation
Ranjit Kumar Paul & Md Yeasin & C. Tamilselvi & A. K. Paul & Purushottam Sharma & Pratap S. Birthal, 2025.
"Can Deep Learning Models Enhance the Accuracy of Agricultural Price Forecasting? Insights From India,"
Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(1), March.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:isacfm:v:32:y:2025:i:1:n:e70002
DOI: 10.1002/isaf.70002
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:isacfm:v:32:y:2025:i:1:n:e70002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/1099-1174/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.