IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/intssr/v66y2013i1p71-95.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Alternative care options and policy choices to support orphans: The case of Mozambique in the context of the SADC

Author

Listed:
  • Tomoko Shibuya
  • Viviene Taylor

Abstract

Contextualizing the situation of orphans within the Southern African region and drawing on quantitative and qualitative field research, this article analyses care options and social protection policy for orphans in Mozambique, with its focus placed on children in orphan support centres. Seeking to offer new insights and greater understanding of the experiences of children in care and of the social protection available to them, the research highlights that orphaned children living in informal foster care arrangements are more likely to experience abuse, neglect and maltreatment than those living in non‐governmental care organizations. The research emphasizes the need for a more careful selection of foster families in which children are placed. Recommendations include the need to focus on capacity building and institutional reforms that provide social protection policies for orphaned children as part of an overall social protection floor. The monitoring and evaluation of organizations providing care to orphaned children is deemed a priority.

Suggested Citation

  • Tomoko Shibuya & Viviene Taylor, 2013. "Alternative care options and policy choices to support orphans: The case of Mozambique in the context of the SADC," International Social Security Review, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 66(1), pages 71-95, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:intssr:v:66:y:2013:i:1:p:71-95
    DOI: 10.1111/issr.12003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/issr.12003
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/issr.12003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:intssr:v:66:y:2013:i:1:p:71-95. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1865-1674 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.