IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/intssr/v45y1992i1-2p5-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Beveridge Report: Its origins and outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Brian Abel‐Smith

Abstract

The Beveridge Committee had an inauspicious start. It was intended by the British government to be a minor tidying‐up operation. When the report was completed, the government seriously considered not publishing it. The report advocated family allowances, a free health service and full employment, and that all social insurance benefits should be at flat rate and at subsistence level with the aim of abolishing poverty. But the actual recommendations would not have fully achieved Beveridge's aims. Although the report had a rapturous media reception, the government initially decided not to commit itself to action. But pressure from parliament forced Prime Minister Churchill to produce plans for legislation. When the report finally became law, the benefits were about a third less than Beveridge had recommended. As a result his social assistance safety net, intended to have a very small role, ended up giving ultimate protection to some 7 million persons. The report had a major influence in other countries by setting a much more ambitious agenda for social security than had generally been accepted before.

Suggested Citation

  • Brian Abel‐Smith, 1992. "The Beveridge Report: Its origins and outcomes," International Social Security Review, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(1‐2), pages 5-16, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:intssr:v:45:y:1992:i:1-2:p:5-16
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-246X.1992.tb00900.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-246X.1992.tb00900.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1468-246X.1992.tb00900.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:intssr:v:45:y:1992:i:1-2:p:5-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1865-1674 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.