Author
Listed:
- Fiona Turner‐Halliday
- Vicki Welch
- Graham Bryce
- Matt Forde
- Richard Cotmore
- Phil Wilson
- Bridie Fitzpatrick
- Nicholas Watson
- Helen Minnis
Abstract
We argue that major health and social care policy initiatives are not too complex for randomised controlled trial (RCT) methodology and illustrate this using the example of the Best Services Trial (BeST?): a RCT of an infant mental health intervention for maltreated children. We suggest that qualitative research, as a core part of the trial process from conception and development through to implementation and evaluation, is crucial in building, understanding and strengthening the partnership required to drive such a complex trial. Data pertinent to trial implementation demonstrate the iterative nature of the process whereby stakeholders are consulted and their views influence the conduct of the trial. Here we reflect on the bi‐directional relationship between qualitative data collection and partnership‐working in a trial. For very complex trials to be possible, significant resource needs to be available for the qualitative component. Key Practitioner Message: • Qualitative research is key to understanding, building and strengthening partnership approaches to researching complex interventions; • Qualitative research is vital to supporting randomised controlled trials involving multiple sectors; • Qualitative research provides essential explanatory power to outcome data in research.
Suggested Citation
Fiona Turner‐Halliday & Vicki Welch & Graham Bryce & Matt Forde & Richard Cotmore & Phil Wilson & Bridie Fitzpatrick & Nicholas Watson & Helen Minnis, 2018.
"Partnership approaches to the evaluation of complex policy initiatives: Qualitative research as key to building effective relationships,"
International Journal of Social Welfare, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 381-387, October.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:injsow:v:27:y:2018:i:4:p:381-387
DOI: 10.1111/ijsw.12326
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:injsow:v:27:y:2018:i:4:p:381-387. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1468-2397 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.