IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/ijfiec/v30y2025i2p1124-1142.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The tail connectedness among conventional, religious, and sustainable investments: An empirical evidence from neural network quantile regression approach

Author

Listed:
  • Xin Jin
  • Bisharat Hussain Chang
  • Chaosheng Han
  • Mohammed Ahmar Uddin

Abstract

Financial markets are highly unpredictable and often associated with tail risks. This study examines the tail connectivity among three distinct markets—conventional, religious, and sustainable—and uses a new neural network quantile regression technique to quantify their risk exposure. The findings suggest that traditional and religious investments have the greatest tail risk exposure during crises, emphasising the importance of diversification using sustainable investments. The Systematic Network Risk Index identifies intense events, such as the COVID‐19 pandemic, the European debt crisis, and the global financial crisis, as having the greatest tail risk. The Systematic Fragility Index finds the Islamic stocks during the COVID‐19 crisis and the conventional stock market before the pandemic to the highly vulnerable markets. On the other hand, the Systemic Hazard Index identifies Islamic stocks as the primary source of systemic risk. The study concludes by providing implications for decision‐makers, regulatory authorities, investors, players in the financial system, and investment managers to diversify their risk by utilising green/sustainable investments.

Suggested Citation

  • Xin Jin & Bisharat Hussain Chang & Chaosheng Han & Mohammed Ahmar Uddin, 2025. "The tail connectedness among conventional, religious, and sustainable investments: An empirical evidence from neural network quantile regression approach," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(2), pages 1124-1142, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:ijfiec:v:30:y:2025:i:2:p:1124-1142
    DOI: 10.1002/ijfe.2949
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2949
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/ijfe.2949?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:ijfiec:v:30:y:2025:i:2:p:1124-1142. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/1076-9307/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.