IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/ijfiec/v28y2023i1p902-928.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of IFRS complexity on analyst forecast properties: The moderating role of high quality audit

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Shahin Miah
  • Haiyan Jiang
  • Asheq Rahman
  • Warwick Stent

Abstract

This paper examines the impact of International Financial Reporting Standards (hereafter IFRS) complexity on analyst forecast properties including forecast errors, forecast dispersion and forecast revision. Because high‐quality audit is likely to moderate the effect of complexity on analyst forecast properties, Industry Specialization (ISP) as a proxy for high quality audit is introduced as a moderating variable in this paper. The complexity of individual IFRS standards is measured based on IFRS reconciliation statements capturing the adjustments on accounts affected by the changes in accounting standards. We analyze 322 companies listed on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX). Our results suggest that all IFRS standards are not equally complex. A few standards are relatively more complex. These standards have a positive effect on analyst forecast errors, forecast dispersion and forecast revision. In addition, we find that high quality audit (proxied by city‐level industry specialist auditors) can mitigate the adverse impact of IFRS complexity on analyst forecast errors but not on forecast dispersion and revision. More interestingly, the mitigating effect of high quality audit is restricted to only a group of companies exposed to a higher level of aggregate IFRS complexity. The findings of our study contribute to the IFRS literature by identifying the most complex accounting standards. Secondly, this study provides an ex‐ante experiment in IFRS adoption, which can be used by adopting countries to understand the impact of IFRS on the analyst forecasts. Finally, our study helps regulators to understand the effects of the complexity of accounting standards on users of financial statements.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Shahin Miah & Haiyan Jiang & Asheq Rahman & Warwick Stent, 2023. "The impact of IFRS complexity on analyst forecast properties: The moderating role of high quality audit," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(1), pages 902-928, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:ijfiec:v:28:y:2023:i:1:p:902-928
    DOI: 10.1002/ijfe.2456
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2456
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/ijfe.2456?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Donal Byard & Ying Li & Yong Yu, 2011. "The Effect of Mandatory IFRS Adoption on Financial Analysts’ Information Environment," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(1), pages 69-96, March.
    2. Holger Daske & Günther Gebhardt, 2006. "International financial reporting standards and experts’ perceptions of disclosure quality," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 42(3‐4), pages 461-498, September.
    3. Hollis Ashbaugh & Morton Pincus, 2001. "Domestic Accounting Standards, International Accounting Standards, and the Predictability of Earnings," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(3), pages 417-434, December.
    4. Christopher Nobes, 2008. "‘57 Varieties of Serious Defect in IFRS?’," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 18(4), pages 283-286, December.
    5. Craswell, Allen T. & Francis, Jere R. & Taylor, Stephen L., 1995. "Auditor brand name reputations and industry specializations," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 297-322, December.
    6. Gus De Franco & Ole†Kristian Hope & Dushyantkumar Vyas & Yibin Zhou, 2015. "Analyst Report Readability," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(1), pages 76-104, March.
    7. Martin Bugeja & Robert Czernkowski & Daryl Moran, 2015. "The Impact of the Management Approach on Segment Reporting," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(3-4), pages 310-366, April.
    8. Zoltan Matolcsy & Anne Wyatt, 2006. "Capitalized intangibles and financial analysts," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 46(3), pages 457-479, September.
    9. Chang, Hye Sun & Donohoe, Michael & Sougiannis, Theodore, 2016. "Do analysts understand the economic and reporting complexities of derivatives?," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(2), pages 584-604.
    10. Andreas Charitou & Irene Karamanou & Anastasia Kopita, 2018. "Are analyst stock recommendation revisions more informative in the post†IFRS period?," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(1-2), pages 115-139, January.
    11. Soo Young Kwon & Kyunga Na & Jongil Park, 2019. "The economic effects of IFRS adoption in Korea," Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(4), pages 321-361, July.
    12. Bhushan, Ravi, 1989. "Firm characteristics and analyst following," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 11(2-3), pages 255-274, July.
    13. Ramnath, Sundaresh & Rock, Steve & Shane, Philip, 2008. "The financial analyst forecasting literature: A taxonomy with suggestions for further research," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 34-75.
    14. Li, Feng, 2008. "Annual report readability, current earnings, and earnings persistence," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(2-3), pages 221-247, August.
    15. Barth, Mary E. & Landsman, Wayne R. & Wahlen, James M., 1995. "Fair value accounting: Effects on banks' earnings volatility, regulatory capital, and value of contractual cash flows," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 19(3-4), pages 577-605, June.
    16. Muhammad Shahin Miah & Haiyan Jiang & Asheq Rahman & Warwick Stent, 2020. "Audit effort, materiality and audit fees: evidence from the adoption of IFRS in Australia," Accounting Research Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 33(1), pages 186-216, January.
    17. Keryn Chalmers & Greg Clinch & Jayne M. Godfrey & Zi Wei, 2012. "Intangible assets, IFRS and analysts’ earnings forecasts," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 52(3), pages 691-721, September.
    18. Robert C. Ricketts & Mark E. Riley & Rebecca Toppe Shortridge, 2018. "Information content of IFRS versus GAAP financial statements," Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 16(1), pages 120-137, March.
    19. Jiao, Tao & Koning, Miriam & Mertens, Gerard & Roosenboom, Peter, 2012. "Mandatory IFRS adoption and its impact on analysts' forecasts," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 56-63.
    20. Aboud, Ahmed & Roberts, Clare & Mansour Zalata, Alaa, 2018. "The impact of IFRS 8 on financial analysts’ earnings forecast errors: EU evidence," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 2-17.
    21. Joshua J. Filzen & Kyle Peterson, 2015. "Financial Statement Complexity and Meeting Analysts’ Expectations," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(4), pages 1560-1594, December.
    22. Warwick Stent & Michael E. Bradbury & Jill Hooks, 2017. "Insights into accounting choice from the adoption timing of International Financial Reporting Standards," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 57, pages 255-276, April.
    23. Hodgdon, Christopher & Tondkar, Rasoul H. & Harless, David W. & Adhikari, Ajay, 2008. "Compliance with IFRS disclosure requirements and individual analysts’ forecast errors," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 1-13.
    24. Brown, Ld & Richardson, Gd & Schwager, Sj, 1987. "An Information Interpretation Of Financial Analyst Superiority In Forecasting Earnings," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(1), pages 49-67.
    25. Vincent E. Owhoso & William F. Messier, Jr. & John G. Lynch, Jr., 2002. "Error Detection by Industry‐Specialized Teams during Sequential Audit Review," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(3), pages 883-900, June.
    26. Philip Brown & Ann Tarca, 2001. "Politics, Processes and the Future of Australian Accounting Standards," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 37(3), pages 267-296, October.
    27. Andrew C. Ferguson & Jere R. Francis & Donald J. Stokes, 2006. "What matters in audit pricing: industry specialization or overall market leadership?," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 46(1), pages 97-106, March.
    28. Sun, Jerry & Liu, Guoping, 2011. "Industry specialist auditors, outsider directors, and financial analysts," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 367-382, July.
    29. Matthias Demmer & Paul Pronobis & Teri Lombardi Yohn, 2019. "Mandatory IFRS adoption and analyst forecast accuracy: the role of financial statement-based forecasts and analyst characteristics," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 1022-1065, September.
    30. Heckman, James, 2013. "Sample selection bias as a specification error," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 31(3), pages 129-137.
    31. Freeman, Rn & Tse, S, 1989. "The Multiperiod Information-Content Of Accounting Earnings - Confirmations And Contradictions Of Previous Earnings Reports," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27, pages 49-79.
    32. Rick Cuijpers & Willem Buijink, 2005. "Voluntary adoption of non-local GAAP in the European Union: A study of determinants and consequences," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(3), pages 487-524.
    33. Pathiranage, Nandana P.W. & Jubb, Christine A., 2018. "Does IFRS make analysts more efficient in using fundamental information included in financial statements?," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 373-385.
    34. Christensen, Hans B. & Hail, Luzi & Leuz, Christian, 2013. "Mandatory IFRS reporting and changes in enforcement," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 147-177.
    35. Julie Cotter & Ann Tarca & Marvin Wee, 2012. "IFRS adoption and analysts’ earnings forecasts: Australian evidence," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 52(2), pages 395-419, June.
    36. Hongping Tan & Shiheng Wang & Michael Welker, 2011. "Analyst Following and Forecast Accuracy After Mandated IFRS Adoptions," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(5), pages 1307-1357, December.
    37. Joanne Horton & George Serafeim & Ioanna Serafeim, 2013. "Does Mandatory IFRS Adoption Improve the Information Environment?," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1), pages 388-423, March.
    38. Mary E. Barth & Wayne R. Landsman & Danqing Young & Zili Zhuang, 2014. "Relevance of Differences between Net Income based on IFRS and Domestic Standards for European Firms," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(3-4), pages 297-327, April.
    39. Mendenhall, Rr, 1991. "Evidence On The Possible Underweighting Of Earnings-Related Information," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 170-179.
    40. Ru Gao & Baljit K. Sidhu, 2018. "Convergence of accounting standards and financial reporting externality: evidence from mandatory IFRS adoption," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 58(3), pages 817-848, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eliwa, Yasser & Haslam, Jim & Abraham, Santhosh, 2021. "Earnings quality and analysts’ information environment: Evidence from the EU market," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 42(C).
    2. Houqe, Muhammad Nurul & Easton, Samuel & van Zijl, Tony, 2014. "Does mandatory IFRS adoption improve information quality in low investor protection countries?," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 87-97.
    3. Barniv, Ran R. & Myring, Mark & Westfall, Tiffany, 2022. "Does IFRS experience improve analyst performance?," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    4. Gaëlle Lenormand & Lionel Touchais, 2017. "The Financial Analysts' Forecasts And The Intangible: Do The Ias/Ifrs Lead To An Improvement? [Les Previsions Des Analystes Financiers Et Les Incorporels : Les Ias/Ifrs Apportent-Elles Une Ameliora," Post-Print hal-03125440, HAL.
    5. Ahmed, Kamran & Chalmers, Keryn & Khlif, Hichem, 2013. "A Meta-analysis of IFRS Adoption Effects," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 173-217.
    6. John Preiato & Philip Brown & Ann Tarca, 2015. "A Comparison of Between-Country Measures of Legal Setting and Enforcement of Accounting Standards," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(1-2), pages 1-50, January.
    7. Ru Gao & Baljit K. Sidhu, 2018. "The Impact of Mandatory International Financial Reporting Standards Adoption on Investment Efficiency: Standards, Enforcement, and Reporting Incentives," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 54(3), pages 277-318, September.
    8. Shirley Liu, 2017. "Does the requirement of an engagement partner signature improve financial analysts’ information environment in the United Kingdom?," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 263-281, July.
    9. Kim, Jong-Hoon & Fujiyama, Keishi & Koga, Yuya, 2024. "The effect of voluntary international financial reporting standards adoption on information asymmetry in the stock market: Evidence from Japan," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    10. Cho, Meeok & Kim, Sehee & Kim, Yewon & Lee, Bryan Byung-Hee & Lee, Woo-Jong, 2021. "IFRS adoption and stock misvaluation: Implication to Korea discount," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    11. Hela Turki & Senda Wali & Younes Boujelbene, 2016. "The effect of IFRS mandatory adoption on the information asymmetry," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 1209100-120, December.
    12. Eliwa, Yasser & Haslam, Jim & Abraham, Santhosh, 2016. "The association between earnings quality and the cost of equity capital: Evidence from the UK," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 125-139.
    13. Najeb Masoud, 2017. "The effects of mandatory IFRS adoption on financial analysts’ forecast: Evidence from Jordan," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 1290331-129, January.
    14. Jing Wang & Wei Li & Arno Forst, 2021. "Product market competition, stock price informativeness, and IFRS adoption: evidence from Europe," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 1537-1559, May.
    15. André, Paul & Filip, Andrei & Moldovan, Rucsandra, 2016. "Segment Disclosure Quantity and Quality under IFRS 8: Determinants and the Effect on Financial Analysts' Earnings Forecast Errors," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 51(4), pages 443-461.
    16. De George, Emmanuel T. & Li, Xi & Shivakumar, Lakshmanan, 2016. "A review of the IFRS adoption literature," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 67599, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    17. Christof Beuselinck & Philip Joos & Inder Khurana & Sofie van Der Meulen, 2017. "Which Analysts Benefited Most from Mandatory IFRS Adoption in Europe?," Post-Print hal-01745251, HAL.
    18. Pathiranage, Nandana P.W. & Jubb, Christine A., 2018. "Does IFRS make analysts more efficient in using fundamental information included in financial statements?," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 373-385.
    19. Emmanuel T. De George & Xi Li & Lakshmanan Shivakumar, 2016. "A review of the IFRS adoption literature," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 898-1004, September.
    20. Aboud, Ahmed, 2023. "Segmental reporting, accounting enforcement, and analyst forecast dispersion in the European Union," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:ijfiec:v:28:y:2023:i:1:p:902-928. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/1076-9307/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.