IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/idsxxx/v45y2014i6p37-48.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Triviality of Measuring Ultimate Outcomes: Acknowledging the Span of Direct Influence

Author

Listed:
  • Giel Ton
  • Sietze Vellema
  • Lan Ge

Abstract

Sustainability standards and certification schemes have been promoted as a market‐driven instrument for realising development impacts and receive public funding. As a result, companies, NGOs and supporting donors and governments want to know if these ambitions have been fulfilled. Their tendency is to commission household surveys to assess net effects of certification in areas such as poverty, productivity and food security. This article argues that, rather than trying to measure precise net effects on farmer income, the focus should be on detailed measurement of more immediate outcomes in terms of knowledge and implementation of good agricultural practices. Contribution analysis is proposed as an overall approach to verify the theory of change, combining survey‐based net‐effect measurement of these immediate and intermediate outcomes with less precise, lean monitoring of indicators to verify the contributory role of these outcomes that are outside the span of direct influence, such as household income and poverty alleviation.

Suggested Citation

  • Giel Ton & Sietze Vellema & Lan Ge, 2014. "The Triviality of Measuring Ultimate Outcomes: Acknowledging the Span of Direct Influence," IDS Bulletin, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 45(6), pages 37-48, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:idsxxx:v:45:y:2014:i:6:p:37-48
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/1759-5436.12111
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lam, Steven & Dodd, Warren & Wyngaarden, Sara & Skinner, Kelly & Papadopoulos, Andrew & Harper, Sherilee L., 2021. "How and why are Theory of Change and Realist Evaluation used in food security contexts? A scoping review," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    2. Glover, Dominic & Poole, Nigel, 2019. "Principles of innovation to build nutrition-sensitive food systems in South Asia," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 63-73.
    3. Johnson, Nancy L. & Mayne, John & Grace, Delia & Wyatt, Amanda, 2015. "How will training traders contribute to improved food safety in informal markets for meat and milk? A theory of change analysis:," IFPRI discussion papers 1451, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:idsxxx:v:45:y:2014:i:6:p:37-48. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0265-5012 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.