IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/idsxxx/v45y2014i4p57-69.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

China and African Development: Partnership not Mentoring

Author

Listed:
  • Jing Gu
  • Anthony Carty

Abstract

This article states the conclusions of major field research into the impact of Chinese public and private economic activity on governance in Africa. China has gone into parts of Africa and sectors of African activity where Western actors have been reluctant to venture, yet receives criticism for not reaching standards of governance which the West itself is not able to apply. The Chinese go into Africa on a basis of equality and partnership but are unclear how to impose standards of conduct which are not integral to a consensual relationship or how to guide the development of standards which they do not have at home. China is itself engaging in a continuing process of economic reform and increasing privatisation. Nonetheless, it has developed a doctrine of effective governance in Africa which stresses responsibility and accountability, provision of basic services and social stability, a central Chinese objective at home and abroad.

Suggested Citation

  • Jing Gu & Anthony Carty, 2014. "China and African Development: Partnership not Mentoring," IDS Bulletin, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 45(4), pages 57-69, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:idsxxx:v:45:y:2014:i:4:p:57-69
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/1759-5436.12093
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fujin Yi & Richard T. Gudaj & Valeria Arefieva & Svetlana Mishchuk & Tatiana A. Potenko & Renata Yanbykh & Jiayi Zhou & Ivan Zuenko, 2020. "How Chinese Agricultural Immigrants Affect Farmers in the Russian Far East," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 79(5), pages 1387-1415, November.
    2. Xiaoyu Jiang & Yangfen Chen & Lijuan Wang, 2018. "Can China’s Agricultural FDI in Developing Countries Achieve a Win-Win Goal?—Enlightenment from the Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-22, December.
    3. Scoones, Ian & Amanor, Kojo & Favareto, Arilson & Qi, Gubo, 2016. "A New Politics of Development Cooperation? Chinese and Brazilian Engagements in African Agriculture," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 1-12.
    4. David Sedik & Fujin Yi & Richard T. Gudaj, 2020. "Implications of Chinese Farmers in the Russian Far East," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 79(5), pages 1615-1622, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:idsxxx:v:45:y:2014:i:4:p:57-69. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0265-5012 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.