IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/hlthec/v9y2000i1p19-35.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Policy analysis of the use of hepatitis B, Haemophilus influenzae type b‐, Streptococcus pneumoniae‐conjugate and rotavirus vaccines in national immunization schedules

Author

Listed:
  • Mark A. Miller
  • Laura McCann

Abstract

After the development of national vaccine programmes to deliver six vaccines to infants, new vaccine adoption has been limited. Analysis of the health and economic implications of new vaccination options can help national policy‐makers. Country specific quantitative policy analyses were conducted to estimate the impact of vaccination against hepatitis B (HB), Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib), Streptococcus pneumoniae (SP) and rotavirus. Disease burden, programme costs and the potential reduction of disease from vaccination was assessed for each vaccine. Without vaccination, these four vaccine preventable diseases contribute up to 4.1 million deaths in each successive birth cohort. Routine scheduled use of HB and Hib vaccines could prevent up to 1.7 million deaths; SP and rotavirus vaccines, an additional 1.4 million deaths, annually. The global cost per life‐year saved ranged from $29 to $150 with great variation by income and economic groups. With a few exceptions for a few countries, these vaccines would cost a fraction of average per‐capita gross domestic product to save a life‐year. The addition of HB and Hib vaccines, should be considered for integration in all national immunization programmes. SP and rotavirus vaccines, with the given assumptions, would also be cost‐effective. Proactive analysis of the economic and epidemiologic impact of these vaccines can hasten their introduction into national vaccination schedules. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark A. Miller & Laura McCann, 2000. "Policy analysis of the use of hepatitis B, Haemophilus influenzae type b‐, Streptococcus pneumoniae‐conjugate and rotavirus vaccines in national immunization schedules," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 9(1), pages 19-35, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:9:y:2000:i:1:p:19-35
    DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(200001)9:1<19::AID-HEC487>3.0.CO;2-C
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(200001)9:13.0.CO;2-C
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(200001)9:1<19::AID-HEC487>3.0.CO;2-C?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jacob M. Puliyel & Mark Miller, 2004. "Letter to the editor," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 13(11), pages 1147-1148, November.
    2. David W. Hutton & Margaret L. Brandeau, 2013. "Too Much of a Good Thing? When to Stop Catch-Up Vaccination," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 33(7), pages 920-936, October.
    3. Phusit Prakongsai & Natasha Palmer & Preecha Uay-Trakul & Viroj Tangcharoensathien & Anne Mills, 2009. "The implications of benefit package design: the impact on poor Thai households of excluding renal replacement therapy," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(2), pages 291-308.
    4. Bjarne Robberstad & John Cairns, 2007. "Time Preferences for Health in Northern Tanzania," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 73-88, January.
    5. Joke Bilcke & Philippe Beutels, 2009. "Reviewing the Cost Effectiveness of Rotavirus Vaccination," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 281-297, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:9:y:2000:i:1:p:19-35. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/5749 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.