IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/hlthec/v8y1999i5p429-440.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Non‐ and semi‐parametric estimation of age and time heterogeneity in repeated cross‐sections: an application to self‐reported morbidity and general practitioner utilization1

Author

Listed:
  • David Parkin
  • Nigel Rice
  • Matthew Sutton

Abstract

Patterns of self‐reported morbidity and general practitioner (GP) utilization exhibit complex age, sex and time heterogeneity. Underlying patterns are often obscured by data which are overly ‘rough’ because of noise associated with adjacent year fluctuations. In this paper we describe methods to obtain smoothed estimates of age, time and birth‐cohort effects using data from the General Household Survey (GHS), covering the period 1984–1995/6 inclusive. The methods outlined offer powerful analytic tools to research complex profiles or trends, particularly over age or time. The relationships of the morbidity and GP utilization measures with age, sex and survey year characteristics are estimated non‐parametrically using roughness penalized least squares (RPLS). A semi‐parametric extension of this model is used to estimate the effect of the morbidity variables on GP utilization. Tests are employed for various forms of age and time heterogeneity including birth‐cohort effects. Linear age specifications are rejected for all variables and evidence is found of time heterogeneity in one of the morbidity measures—limiting long‐standing illness (LS)—and GP utilization. The advantages of employing non‐ and semi‐parametric estimations in the presence of complex relationships such as those observed for age and time profiles are discussed. Adoption of these techniques by applied econometricians working in health economics is encouraged. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • David Parkin & Nigel Rice & Matthew Sutton, 1999. "Non‐ and semi‐parametric estimation of age and time heterogeneity in repeated cross‐sections: an application to self‐reported morbidity and general practitioner utilization1," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 8(5), pages 429-440, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:8:y:1999:i:5:p:429-440
    DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199908)8:5<429::AID-HEC459>3.0.CO;2-I
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199908)8:53.0.CO;2-I
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199908)8:5<429::AID-HEC459>3.0.CO;2-I?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Matthew Polisson, 2011. "Do waiting times matter in primary care? GP visits and list sizes in England," Economics Series Working Papers 541, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    2. Mason, Thomas & Sutton, Matt & Whittaker, William & Birch, Stephen, 2015. "Exploring the limitations of age-based models for health care planning," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 11-19.
    3. Kosei Fukuda, 2007. "An empirical analysis of US and Japanese health insurance using age–period–cohort decomposition," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(5), pages 475-489, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:8:y:1999:i:5:p:429-440. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/5749 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.