Author
Listed:
- Richard J. Stewart
- Karl Perry
- Robert D. Bowie
- Desmond J. O'Dea
Abstract
Suspected acute appendicitis is a common reason for surgery. Unfortunately, diagnosis is not always simple and, in recent years, considerable attention has been devoted to developing better diagnostic techniques. Peritoneal cytology is one such technique. It is simple, minimally invasive, and has been established as clinically effective. This paper reports on an economic evaluation of peritoneal cytology, carried out at Wellington Hospital, New Zealand. The analysis is based on two trials totalling 192 patients. The perspective taken initially is that of a hospital financial manager, seeking to minimise costs. In the first trial, there was a marginal increase in overall cost per person presenting with suspected acute appendicitis, from using the test. In the second, there was a reduction. In both trials there were significant health benefits—unnecessary operations were avoided, and necessary operations done more quickly. Also, the practice developed, in the second trial, of sending patients home immediately following a negative test result. This further increased savings. We then discuss the results from a broader perspective. We conclude that the additional personal benefits—less time convalescing, and lower mortality, on average—ensure that the benefits outweigh the costs of the test.
Suggested Citation
Richard J. Stewart & Karl Perry & Robert D. Bowie & Desmond J. O'Dea, 1994.
"Peritoneal cytology for suspected acute appendicitis: An economic evaluation,"
Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 3(5), pages 321-332, September.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:3:y:1994:i:5:p:321-332
DOI: 10.1002/hec.4730030506
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:3:y:1994:i:5:p:321-332. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/5749 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.