Author
Listed:
- Dandan Zhang
- Xiang‐Ming Zhang
- Xiao Liu
Abstract
Wuhan, China, where SARS‐CoV‐2 was detected first, has been recorded as one of the epicenters with the highest COVID‐19 fatality rates worldwide. High COVID‐19 fatality rates may stem from severe medical resource scarcity, especially in the early stage of the pandemic outbreak. In the first few weeks of the COVID‐19 outbreak, Wuhan experienced the hardship of a severe “hospital run” period, when hospitals operated far beyond their maximum capacity and then soon transformed into “inclusive healthcare,” that is, every infectious person can access free medical treatment. Based on detailed administrative data of hospital admission and medical treatment for 1537 COVID‐19 patients, we investigate how the COVID‐19 fatality rates can be affected by the patient's socioeconomic status (SES) and differences in the effect between the two periods. Our estimation results show that low‐SES patients had higher fatality rates during the “hospital run” period. Differential opportunities for hospitalization do not drive this inequality in fatality rates; rather, they are driven by the medical treatment after hospital admission, namely reduced treatment intensity and limited access to specific medical treatment and medications for COVID‐19. When the government implemented the “inclusive healthcare” policy, severe medical resource scarcity was alleviated, and the inequality in fatality rates ceased to exist. These findings verify the existence of medical inequality among low‐SES people amid severe medical resource shortages and also highlight the importance of rapidly increasing hospital capacity and medical supply in reducing possible unequal treatment and tackling inequalities in medical outcomes, especially during a public health crisis.
Suggested Citation
Dandan Zhang & Xiang‐Ming Zhang & Xiao Liu, 2025.
"Medical Resource Scarcity and Inequality in COVID‐19 Fatality Rates: Evidence From Hospitalized Patients in Wuhan, China,"
Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(3), pages 376-391, March.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:34:y:2025:i:3:p:376-391
DOI: 10.1002/hec.4916
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:34:y:2025:i:3:p:376-391. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/5749 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.