IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/hlthec/v34y2025i2p345-367.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of hospital‐physician vertical integration on physician‐administered drug spending and utilization

Author

Listed:
  • Jonathan S. Levin
  • Xiaoxi Zhao
  • Christopher Whaley

Abstract

We estimate the effects of hospital‐physician vertical integration on spending and utilization of physician‐administered drugs for hematology‐oncology, ophthalmology, and rheumatology. Using a 100% sample of Medicare fee‐for‐service medical claims from 2013 to 2017, we find that vertical integration shifts treatments away from physician offices and toward hospital outpatient departments. These shifts are accompanied by increases in physician‐administered drug administration spending per procedure for all three specialties. Spending on Part B drugs also increases for hematologist‐oncologists. At the same time, physician treatment intensity, as measured by the number of beneficiaries who receive drug infusions/injections and the number of drug infusions, decreases across all three specialties. These results suggest that the incentives of the Medicare reimbursement system, particularly site‐of‐care payment differentials and outpatient drug reimbursement rates, interact with vertical integration to lead to higher overall spending. Policies and merger guidelines should attempt to restrain spending increases attributed to vertical integration.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonathan S. Levin & Xiaoxi Zhao & Christopher Whaley, 2025. "Impact of hospital‐physician vertical integration on physician‐administered drug spending and utilization," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(2), pages 345-367, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:34:y:2025:i:2:p:345-367
    DOI: 10.1002/hec.4909
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.4909
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/hec.4909?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:34:y:2025:i:2:p:345-367. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/5749 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.