Author
Listed:
- Jennifer A. Ailshire
- Maria Casanova
Abstract
In the US, spouses are a major source of informal care for older adults and, therefore, key to the US national strategy to provide long‐term care to the growing population of older adults. Understanding the mental health impacts of spousal caregiving is therefore critically important. Existing studies on the topic have often been limited by methodological limitations, and most overlook the role of caregiving intensity. In this study, we assess the impact of providing different intensities of caregiving to a spouse on mental health outcomes using data from the Health and Retirement Study. We address the endogeneity of the decision to provide different caregiving intensities using an augmented inverse probability weighted (AIPW) estimator adapted to handle multivalued treatments. We check the robustness of our estimates to the AIPW's identifying assumptions by re‐estimating the model using a dynamic fixed effects estimator. We find strong evidence that becoming a caregiver is associated with worsened mental health outcomes for women, while the evidence for men is weaker. When disaggregating by caregiving intensity, we find that transitions into high‐intensity caregiving lead to large increases in depression symptoms and the probability of exhibiting major depression for both men and women. The overall mental health impact of transiting into caregiving is driven almost exclusively by the negative impact of high‐intensity caregiving, as transitions into low‐ and moderate‐intensity caregiving are not associated with worsening mental health in most specifications. This study provides timely insights that can inform the targeting of long‐term care policies and programs aimed at supporting family caregivers of older adults.
Suggested Citation
Jennifer A. Ailshire & Maria Casanova, 2025.
"Mental health impacts of spousal caregiving intensity in the US,"
Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(2), pages 267-282, February.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:34:y:2025:i:2:p:267-282
DOI: 10.1002/hec.4908
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:34:y:2025:i:2:p:267-282. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/5749 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.