IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/hlthec/v21y2012is2p103-115.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do Diagnosis‐Related Groups Appropriately Explain Variations In Costs And Length Of Stay Of Hip Replacement? A Comparative Assessment Of Drg Systems Across 10 European Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander Geissler
  • David Scheller‐Kreinsen
  • Wilm Quentin
  • on behalf of the EuroDRG group

Abstract

This paper assesses the variations in costs and length of stay for hip replacement cases in Austria, England, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Poland, Spain and Sweden and examines the ability of national diagnosis‐related group (DRG) systems to explain the variation in resource use against a set of patient characteristic and treatment specific variables. In total, 195 810 cases clustered in 712 hospitals were analyzed using OLS fixed effects models for cost data (n = 125 698) and negative binominal models for length‐of‐stay data (n = 70 112). The number of DRGs differs widely across the 10 European countries (range: 2–14). Underlying this wide range is a different use of classification variables, especially secondary diagnoses and treatment options are considered to a different extent. In six countries, a standard set of patient characteristics and treatment variables explain the variation in costs or length of stay better than the DRG variables. This raises questions about the adequacy of the countries' DRG system or the lack of specific criteria, which could be used as classification variables. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander Geissler & David Scheller‐Kreinsen & Wilm Quentin & on behalf of the EuroDRG group, 2012. "Do Diagnosis‐Related Groups Appropriately Explain Variations In Costs And Length Of Stay Of Hip Replacement? A Comparative Assessment Of Drg Systems Across 10 European Countries," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(S2), pages 103-115, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:21:y:2012:i:s2:p:103-115
    DOI: 10.1002/hec.2848
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.2848
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/hec.2848?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrew Street & Conrad Kobel & Thomas Renaud & Josselin Thuilliez & ON BEHALF OF THE EURODRG GROUP, 2012. "How Well Do Diagnosis‐Related Groups Explain Variations In Costs Or Length Of Stay Among Patients And Across Hospitals? Methods For Analysing Routine Patient Data," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(S2), pages 6-18, August.
    2. Andrew Street & Conrad Kobel & Thomas Renaud & Josselin Thuilliez & ON BEHALF OF THE EURODRG GROUP, 2012. "How Well Do Diagnosis‐Related Groups Explain Variations In Costs Or Length Of Stay Among Patients And Across Hospitals? Methods For Analysing Routine Patient Data," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(S2), pages 6-18, August.
    3. Conrad Kobel & Josselin Thuilliez & Martine Bellanger & Karl-Peter Pfeiffer, 2011. "DRG systems and similar patient classification systems in Europe," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00643049, HAL.
    4. Newhouse, Joseph P. & Byrne, Daniel J., 1988. "Did Medicare's Prospective Payment System cause length of stay to fall?," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 7(4), pages 413-416, December.
    5. Martinussen, Pål E. & Hagen, Terje P., 2009. "Reimbursement systems, organisational forms and patient selection: Evidence from day surgery in Norway," Health Economics, Policy and Law, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(2), pages 139-158, April.
    6. Tom Stargardt, 2008. "Health service costs in Europe: cost and reimbursement of primary hip replacement in nine countries," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 17(S1), pages 9-20, January.
    7. Ellis, Randall P., 1998. "Creaming, skimping and dumping: provider competition on the intensive and extensive margins1," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 537-555, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zuzana Kotherová & Martina Caithamlová & Juraj Nemec & Kateřina Dolejšová, 2021. "The Use of Diagnosis-Related Group-Based Reimbursement in the Czech Hospital Care System," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-18, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Scheller‐Kreinsen & on behalf of the EuroDRG group, 2012. "How Well Do Diagnosis‐Related Group Systems Group Breast Cancer Surgery Patients?—Evidence From 10 European Countries," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(S2), pages 41-54, August.
    2. Reinhard Busse & on behalf of the EuroDRG group, 2012. "DO DIAGNOSIS‐RELATED GROUPS EXPLAIN VARIATIONS IN HOSPITAL COSTS AND LENGTH OF STAY? – ANALYSES FROM THE EURODRG PROJECT FOR 10 EPISODES OF CARE ACROSS 10 EuroPEAN COUNTRIES," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(S2), pages 1-5, August.
    3. Conrad Kobel & Engelbert Theurl, 2013. "Hospital specialisation within a DRG-Framework: The Austrian Case," Working Papers 2013-06, Faculty of Economics and Statistics, Universität Innsbruck.
    4. Francesc Cots & Pietro Chiarello & Xavier Salvador & Xavier Castells & on behalf of the EuroDRG group, 2012. "Patient Classification Systems And Hospital Costs Of Care For Knee Replacement In 10 European Countries," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(S2), pages 116-128, August.
    5. Jacqueline O'Reilly & Lisbeth Serdén & Mats Talbäck & Brian McCarthy & on behalf of the EuroDRG group, 2012. "Performance Of 10 European Drg Systems In Explaining Variation In Resource Utilisation In Inguinal Hernia Repair," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(S2), pages 89-101, August.
    6. James Gaughan & Conrad Kobel & Caroline Linhart & Anne Mason & Andrew Street & Padraic Ward & on behalf of the EuroDRG group, 2012. "Why Do Patients Having Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts Have Different Costs Or Length Of Stay? An Analysis Across 10 European Countries," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(S2), pages 77-88, August.
    7. Zeynep Or & Thomas Renaud & Josselin Thuilliez & Cora Lebreton & on behalf of the EuroDRG group, 2012. "Diagnosis Related Groups And Variations In Resource Use For Child Delivery Across 10 European Countries," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(S2), pages 55-65, August.
    8. Carine Milcent, 2016. "Upcoding and heterogeneity in hospitals’ response: A Natural Experiment," PSE Working Papers halshs-01340557, HAL.
    9. Li‐Lin Liang, 2015. "Do Diagnosis‐Related Group‐Based Payments Incentivise Hospitals to Adjust Output Mix?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(4), pages 454-469, April.
    10. Bertoli, Paola & Grembi, Veronica, 2017. "The political economy of diagnosis-related groups," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 38-47.
    11. Karen S Palmer & Thomas Agoritsas & Danielle Martin & Taryn Scott & Sohail M Mulla & Ashley P Miller & Arnav Agarwal & Andrew Bresnahan & Afeez Abiola Hazzan & Rebecca A Jeffery & Arnaud Merglen & Ahm, 2014. "Activity-Based Funding of Hospitals and Its Impact on Mortality, Readmission, Discharge Destination, Severity of Illness, and Volume of Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(10), pages 1-1, October.
    12. Christopher Afendulis & Daniel Kessler, 2011. "Vertical integration and optimal reimbursement policy," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 165-179, September.
    13. Kjøstolfsen, Gjertrud Hole & Baheerathan, Janusha & Martinussen, Pål E. & Magnussen, Jon, 2021. "Financial incentives and patient selection: Hospital physicians’ views on cream skimming and economic management focus in Norway," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(1), pages 98-103.
    14. Melberg, Hans Olav & Beck Olsen, Camilla & Pedersen, Kine, 2016. "Did hospitals respond to changes in weights of Diagnosis Related Groups in Norway between 2006 and 2013?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(9), pages 992-1000.
    15. Anne Mason & Zeynep Or & Thomas Renaud & Andrew Street & Josselin Thuilliez & Padraic Ward & ON BEHALF OF THE EURODRG GROUP, 2012. "How Well Do Diagnosis‐Related Groups For Appendectomy Explain Variations In Resource Use? An Analysis Of Patient‐Level Data From 10 European Countries," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(S2), pages 30-40, August.
    16. Jurgita Januleviciute & Jan Erik Askildsen & Oddvar Kaarboe & Luigi Siciliani & Matt Sutton, 2016. "How do Hospitals Respond to Price Changes? Evidence from Norway," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(5), pages 620-636, May.
    17. James Gaughan & Anne Mason & Andrew Street & Padraic Ward, 2012. "English Hospitals Can Improve Their Use of Resources: An Analysis of Costs and Length of Stay for Ten Treatments," Working Papers 078cherp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    18. Stefan Rabbe & Meilin Möllenkamp & Benedetta Pongiglione & Hedwig Blommestein & Pim Wetzelaer & Renaud Heine & Jonas Schreyögg, 2022. "Variation in the utilization of medical devices across Germany, Italy, and the Netherlands: A multilevel approach," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(S1), pages 135-156, September.
    19. James Gaughan & Conrad Kobel, 2014. "Coronary artery bypass grafts and diagnosis related groups: patient classification and hospital reimbursement in 10 European countries," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 1-13, December.
    20. Martin, Stephen & Street, Andrew & Han, Lu & Hutton, John, 2016. "Have hospital readmissions increased in the face of reductions in length of stay? Evidence from England," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(1), pages 89-99.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:21:y:2012:i:s2:p:103-115. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/5749 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.