IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/hlthec/v10y2001i8p715-729.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Twenty years of health care economic analysis in Spain: are we doing well?

Author

Listed:
  • Anna García‐Altés

Abstract

The rising demand for health care, together with the scarce available resources, has increased the use of economic analysis as a support tool for policy making. The objective of this study was to make a description of economic evaluation studies carried out in Spain and published during the last 20 years, and to assess their quality. A systematic bibliographic search was made in the main biomedical databases. Full economic evaluation studies made in Spain comparing two or more health care alternatives were included. Statistical analyses included a descriptive analysis, the assessment of the association between pairs of variables, and a homogeneity analysis. A total of 87 studies were included in the review. According to the methodology, the technique most frequently used was cost‐effectiveness analysis. In most cases, some weaknesses could be pointed out: absence of any objective directly linked to the decision‐making process, a non‐explicit perspective, no inclusion of indirect costs, or clinical and economical data not concurrently collected. A continuing challenge for health care economic analysis in Spain is to follow methodological guidelines and reporting conventions, to improve the dissemination of research, as well as to use more sophisticated economic analysis techniques, and to publish in international journals. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna García‐Altés, 2001. "Twenty years of health care economic analysis in Spain: are we doing well?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 10(8), pages 715-729, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:10:y:2001:i:8:p:715-729
    DOI: 10.1002/hec.608
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.608
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/hec.608?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James Mason & Michael Drummond, 1995. "Reporting guidelines for economic studies," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 4(2), pages 85-94, March.
    2. Salkeld, Glenn & Davey, Peter & Arnolda, Gaston, 1995. "A critical review of health-related economic evaluations in Australia: implications for health policy," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 111-125, February.
    3. Henshall, Christopher & Drummond, Michael, 1994. "Economic appraisal in the British national health service: Implications of recent developments," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 38(12), pages 1615-1623, June.
    4. Gerard, Karen & Smoker, Irenie & Seymour, Janelle, 1999. "Raising the quality of cost-utility analyses: lessons learnt and still to learn," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 217-238, March.
    5. Serra-Prat, M. & Gallo, P. & Jovell, A.J. & Aymerich, M. & Dolors Estrada, M., 1998. "Trade-offs in prenatal detection of down syndrome," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 88(4), pages 551-557.
    6. Rutten, Frans & van der Linden, Jan-Willem, 1994. "Intergration of economic appraisal and health care policy in a health insurance system; The Dutch case," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 38(12), pages 1609-1614, June.
    7. Granados, Alicia & Borràs, Josep M., 1994. "Technology assessment in Catalonia: Integrating economic appraisal," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 38(12), pages 1643-1646, June.
    8. Jean‐François Baladi & Devidas Menon & Nicolaas Otten, 1998. "Use of economic evaluation guidelines: 2 years' experience in Canada," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 7(3), pages 221-227, May.
    9. Davies, Linda & Coyle, Douglas & Drummond, Michael & The EC Network on the Methodology of Economic Appraisal of Health Technology, 1994. "Current status of economic appraisal of health technology in the European community: Report of the network," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 38(12), pages 1601-1607, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gerard, Karen & Smoker, Irenie & Seymour, Janelle, 1999. "Raising the quality of cost-utility analyses: lessons learnt and still to learn," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 217-238, March.
    2. Mike Drummond & Jonathan Cooke & Tom Walley, 1996. "Economic evaluation in health care decision making: evidence from the UK," Working Papers 148chedp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    3. Christopher J.L. Murray & David B. Evans & Arnab Acharya & Rob M.P.M. Baltussen, 2000. "Development of WHO guidelines on generalized cost‐effectiveness analysis," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 9(3), pages 235-251, April.
    4. Rutten, Frans, 1996. "Economic evaluation and health care decision-making," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 215-229, June.
    5. James Mason & Martin Eccles & Nick Freemantle & Mike Drummond, 1998. "NICEly does it: economic analysis within evidence-based clinical practice guidelines," Working Papers 164chedp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    6. Maria-Florencia Hutter & Roberto Rodríguez-Ibeas & Fernando Antonanzas, 2014. "Methodological reviews of economic evaluations in health care: what do they target?," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 15(8), pages 829-840, November.
    7. Chaim M. Bell & Richard H. Chapman & Patricia W. Stone & Eileen A. Sandberg & Peter J. Neumann, 2001. "An Off-the-Shelf Help List," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 21(4), pages 288-294, August.
    8. Vuorenkoski, Lauri & Toiviainen, Hanna & Hemminki, Elina, 2003. "Drug reimbursement in Finland--a case of explicit prioritising in special categories," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(2), pages 169-177, November.
    9. Fernando Antoñanzas & R. Rodríguez-Ibeas & M. Hutter & R. Lorente & C. Juárez & M. Pinillos, 2012. "Genetic testing in the European Union: does economic evaluation matter?," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 13(5), pages 651-661, October.
    10. Susanne Mayer & Noemi Kiss & Agata Łaszewska & Judit Simon, 2017. "Costing evidence for health care decision-making in Austria: A systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, August.
    11. Mark Schreiner, 2001. "Evaluation and Microenterprise Programs," Development and Comp Systems 0108002, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 27 Dec 2001.
    12. Nancy Wolff & Thomas W. Helminiak, 1996. "Nonsampling measurement error in administrative data: Implications for economic evaluations," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 5(6), pages 501-512, November.
    13. Murillo Fort, Carles & González López-Valcárcel, Beatriz, 2006. "Potencialidades Y Limitaciones De Las Ligas De Calidad De Los Proveedores Sanitarios/Quality Ranking Of Health Care Providers: Potential And Limitations," Estudios de Economia Aplicada, Estudios de Economia Aplicada, vol. 24, pages 777-788, Diciembre.
    14. K. Cooper & S. Brailsford & R. Davies & J. Raftery, 2006. "A review of health care models for coronary heart disease interventions," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 9(4), pages 311-324, November.
    15. Kees Gool & Gisselle Gallego & Marion Haas & Rosalie Viney & Jane Hall & Robyn Ward, 2007. "Economic Evidence at the Local Level," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 25(12), pages 1055-1062, December.
    16. van den Heuvel, Wim J. A. & Wieringh, Roelof & van den Heuvel, Lisette P. M., 1997. "Utilisation of medical technology assessment in health policy," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 211-222, December.
    17. Banta, David, 2003. "The development of health technology assessment," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 121-132, February.
    18. Hoffmann, Christiane AU -, 2000. "The influence of economic evaluation studies on decision making.: A European survey," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(3), pages 179-192, July.
    19. Robert W. Hahn & Katrina Kosec & Peter J. Neumann & Scott Wallsten, 2006. "What Affects the Quality of Economic Analysis for Life‐Saving Investments?," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(3), pages 641-655, June.
    20. Tom Jefferson & Miranda Mugford & Alastair Gray & Vittorio Demicheli, 1996. "An exercise on the feasibility of carrying out secondary economic analyses," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 5(2), pages 155-165, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:10:y:2001:i:8:p:715-729. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/5749 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.