Author
Listed:
- Marta K. Schütz
- Leonardo M. dos Santos
- Patrícia M. Coteskvisk
- Sonia C. Menezes
- Sandra Einloft
- Felipe Dalla Vecchia
Abstract
Carbon dioxide (CO2) injection into geological formations is pointed out as one of the most effective alternatives to reduce anthropogenic CO2 emissions to the atmosphere. To promote long‐term CO2 storage, wellbore integrity is a critical issue to be considered. Portland cement is commonly used for cementing wells, and considered chemically unstable in CO2‐rich media. In this context, this study investigated the CO2 chemical resistance of class G Portland cement modified with novel additives (epoxy resins, epoxy–clay composites, and clay minerals) at 1 and 2.5 wt% contents. Reaction times of 7 and 30 days of exposure to CO2 in supercritical conditions were evaluated. Samples were characterized by mechanical compression tests and phenolphthalein indicator as well as field emission scanning electron microscopy in order to determine the depth of carbonation in cement. Our results indicate that although there is slight reduction in the initial compressive strength, the addition of tested additives to cement paste offers improvements in terms of chemical resistance. The optimum content of different additives was 1 wt% in order to maintain compressive strength properties and improve chemical resistance to CO2. The best result was achieved with an epoxy resin blend as an additive, decreasing carbonation by up to 60% (7 days of exposure to CO2) and 52% (30 days of exposure to CO2). Addition of montmorillonite to the epoxy blend tends to improve chemical resistance of cement paste when compared to the neat epoxy blend. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Suggested Citation
Marta K. Schütz & Leonardo M. dos Santos & Patrícia M. Coteskvisk & Sonia C. Menezes & Sandra Einloft & Felipe Dalla Vecchia, 2019.
"Evaluation of CO2 attack in wellbore class G cement: influence of epoxy resins, composites and minerals as additives,"
Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 9(6), pages 1276-1287, December.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:greenh:v:9:y:2019:i:6:p:1276-1287
DOI: 10.1002/ghg.1928
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:9:y:2019:i:6:p:1276-1287. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2152-3878 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.