IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/greenh/v7y2017i2p370-382.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measurements of CO 2 ‐brine relative permeability in Berea sandstone using pressure taps and a long core

Author

Listed:
  • Xiongyu Chen
  • Amir Kianinejad
  • David A. DiCarlo

Abstract

We measured CO 2 ‐brine relative permeability by performing five steady‐state primary drainage experiments in a 116 mD Berea sandstone core at 20°C and 10.34 MPa. We used a long (60.8 cm) core and four pressure taps to study and minimize end effects that can plague CO 2 ‐brine relative permeability measurements, and we obtained in situ saturation profiles using a medical X‐ray Computed Tomography (CT) scanner. We found that entrance and exit effects propagated ∼5 cm into the core, but the center sections of the core had uniform saturation. From the saturations and pressure drops, we obtained both CO 2 and brine relative permeability in the center sections. We also obtained CO 2 relative permeability at the entrance section where the brine saturation was lower and not uniform. The 15‐cm long exit section of the core had non‐uniform saturation and a measured pressure drop that was on the order of the capillary pressure and hence was unreliable for calculating relative permeability. We found that the CO 2 and brine relative permeabilities determined in five experiments were consistent with each other and followed two simple Corey‐type models that are similar to those seen in oil‐brine relative permeability measurements. We discuss why end effects are much greater in the CO 2 ‐brine system than in oil‐brine systems, and how this is a possible explanation of the low CO 2 relative permeabilities recently reported for the CO 2 ‐brine systems. © 2016 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiongyu Chen & Amir Kianinejad & David A. DiCarlo, 2017. "Measurements of CO 2 ‐brine relative permeability in Berea sandstone using pressure taps and a long core," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 7(2), pages 370-382, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:7:y:2017:i:2:p:370-382
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1002/ghg.1650
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:7:y:2017:i:2:p:370-382. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2152-3878 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.