IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/greenh/v6y2016i5p710-723.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of alkaline pre‐treatment of MFI zeolites for N 2 O decomposition: different zeolite sources

Author

Listed:
  • Minfang Wu
  • Xinqing Chen
  • Liangshu Zhong
  • Hui Wang
  • Xinyan Zhang
  • Qun Shen
  • Wei Wei
  • Yuhan Sun

Abstract

Three MFI parent zeolites with different morphological properties by different synthesis method were adopted. Alkaline treatment using sodium hydroxide was introduced to modify the structure of MFI zeolites. After iron exchange, the catalytic performance of both parent and modified MFI zeolites were evaluated in the N 2 O decomposition. The physicochemical properties were systematically characterized with various technologies, such as N 2 adsorption‐desorption, ICP, XRD, UV‐Vis, -super-27Al MAS‐NMR, TEM. The experiment results prove that the Fe‐modified MFI catalysts with alkaline pre‐treatment show much better catalytic activity than Fe‐exchanged parent MFI catalysts. The curves of catalytic activities could move to low temperature range by 50‒100 °C. Furthermore, in the presence of NO, the performance gap between Fe‐Seed‐M, Fe‐Solid‐M, and Fe‐Com‐M three samples is obviously reduced. Amongst, for the Fe‐Solid‐M sample synthesized by the solvent‐free method, 90% N 2 O conversion could be attained at 500 °C, which shows potential to be applied the real condition. It is believed the hierarchical properties and the removal of amorphous substance is beneficial to the diffusion of ion exchange process. Therefore, the increase of active iron sites contributes to the improvement of catalytic performance. © 2016 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

Suggested Citation

  • Minfang Wu & Xinqing Chen & Liangshu Zhong & Hui Wang & Xinyan Zhang & Qun Shen & Wei Wei & Yuhan Sun, 2016. "Comparison of alkaline pre‐treatment of MFI zeolites for N 2 O decomposition: different zeolite sources," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 6(5), pages 710-723, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:6:y:2016:i:5:p:710-723
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1002/ghg.1600
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:6:y:2016:i:5:p:710-723. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2152-3878 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.