Author
Listed:
- Lou Yunsheng
- Meng Yan
- Ren Lixuan
- Wu Lei
- Zhang Yiwei
- Zhao Shidi
- Zhu Huaiwei
Abstract
A pot experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of silicate application quantity and silicate fertilizer type on rice growth and methane (CH 4 ) emission under elevated UV‐B radiation. The experiment was designed with two UV‐B radiation levels, i.e., reference UV‐B radiation (Ambient, A, 12.0 kJ·m-super-−2·d-super-−1), and elevated UV‐B radiation (Elevated by 20%, E, 14.4 kJ·m-super-−2·d-super-−1); with four silicate fertilizer levels, i.e., Si 0 (no silicate application, 0 kg SiO 2 ·ha-super-−1), Si 1 (sodium silicate, 100 kg SiO 2 ·ha-super-−1), Si 2 (sodium silicate, 200 kg SiO 2 ·ha-super-−1) and Si 3 (slag silicate fertilizer, 200 kg SiO 2 ·ha-super-−1). The results show that, silicate application could mitigate the depressive effect of elevated UV‐B radiation on rice growth and increase the tiller number, and dry weight of shoot and root biomass. Silicate application promoted rice growth, which increased with silicate application quantity (sodium silicate); slag silicate fertilizer was better than sodium silicate in promoting rice growth. Elevated UV‐B radiation could increase the emission flux and accumulative emission of CH 4 in rice soil, but silicate application significantly decreased the emission flux and accumulative emission of CH 4 and the methane emission decreased with the increase in silicate application quantity. At one silicate application quantity, slag silicate fertilizer was better than sodium silicate in respect of emission reduction effect. This indicates that application of slag silicate fertilizer in rice production can realize waste reuse and can effectively decrease the CH 4 emission in rice field under elevated UV‐B radiation. © 2016 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
Suggested Citation
Lou Yunsheng & Meng Yan & Ren Lixuan & Wu Lei & Zhang Yiwei & Zhao Shidi & Zhu Huaiwei, 2016.
"Silicate application decreased methane emission from paddy soil under elevated UV‐B radiation,"
Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 6(5), pages 662-669, October.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:greenh:v:6:y:2016:i:5:p:662-669
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:6:y:2016:i:5:p:662-669. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2152-3878 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.