IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/greenh/v5y2015i2p141-151.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Uncertainty quantification for the reliability of the analytical analysis for the simplified model of CO 2 geological sequestration

Author

Listed:
  • Jie Bao
  • Zhijie Xu
  • Yilin Fang

Abstract

A hydromechanical model with analytical solutions including pressure evolution and geomechanical deformation for geological CO 2 injection and sequestration were introduced in our previous work. However, the reliability and accuracy of the hydromechanical model and the companion analytical solution are uncertain because of the assumptions and simplifications in the analytical model, though it was validated by a few example cases. This study introduces a method to efficiently measure the accuracy of the analytical model and specify the range of acceptable input parameters that can guarantee the accuracy and reliability of the analytical solution. A coupled hydro‐geomechanical subsurface transport simulator, Subsurface Transport over Multiple Phases (STOMP), was adopted as a reference to justify the reliability of the hydromechanical model and the analytical solution. A quasi‐Monte Carlo sampling method was applied to efficiently sample the input parameter space.

Suggested Citation

  • Jie Bao & Zhijie Xu & Yilin Fang, 2015. "Uncertainty quantification for the reliability of the analytical analysis for the simplified model of CO 2 geological sequestration," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 5(2), pages 141-151, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:5:y:2015:i:2:p:141-151
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1002/ghg.1436
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:5:y:2015:i:2:p:141-151. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2152-3878 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.