Author
Listed:
- Srikanta Mishra
- Yagna Deepika Oruganti
- Neeraj Gupta
- Priya Ravi Ganesh
- Caitlin McNeil
- Indrajit Bhattacharya
- Gary Spitznogle
Abstract
Supercritical CO 2 injection was carried out at the AEP Mountaineer CO 2 Capture and Geological Storage Project from October 2009 until May 2011. Approximately 27 000 MT and 10 000 MT were injected into the Copper Ridge dolomite formation and Rose Run sandstone formation, respectively. A 2‐D radial‐cylindrical model based on ‘average’ conditions in the study area was developed from integration of well‐log data. STOMP‐CO 2 simulations were carried out to calibrate the observed pressure response using a trial‐and‐error procedure. This involved varying: (i) permeability near the injection well, (ii) permeability of the far‐field region, and (iii) relative permeability model coefficients. Non‐unique combinations of these parameters were found to produce similar pressure matches, but different estimates of plume migration. For the Ridge formation, excellent matches were obtained for the injection pressure/rate data at AEP‐1 and observed pressures at MW‐2, located ∼2200 feet away. Estimates of radial plume migration range between 925 and 975 ft. For the Rose Run formation, excellent matches were obtained for the injection pressure data at AEP‐2 and observed pressure at MW‐3, ∼125 feet away, although the match with MW‐1, located ∼2200 feet away, was less satisfactory. Estimates of radial plume migration range between 460 and 510 ft. The modeling approach and results presented here represent a significant and unique case study of post‐injection modeling at CO 2 storage locations – a critical aspect for successful permit closure in accordance with the EPA requirements.
Suggested Citation
Srikanta Mishra & Yagna Deepika Oruganti & Neeraj Gupta & Priya Ravi Ganesh & Caitlin McNeil & Indrajit Bhattacharya & Gary Spitznogle, 2014.
"Modeling CO 2 plume migration based on calibration of injection and post‐injection pressure response at the AEP Mountaineer Project,"
Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 4(3), pages 331-356, June.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:greenh:v:4:y:2014:i:3:p:331-356
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:4:y:2014:i:3:p:331-356. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2152-3878 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.