Author
Abstract
The long‐term success of carbon sequestration lies in part on the ability to trap carbon dioxide as a carbonate mineral phase. As such, the ability to predict the extent of carbonate mineral precipitation over the lifetime of a proposed geologic sequestration site will be necessary. In this review, different methods of predicting the growth of carbonate minerals, particularly calcite, and their disadvantages and advantages are summarized. Starting from a simple description of the solution saturation state, more advanced affinity‐based models are described that comprise the status quo. In these, the reaction rate is measured by the difference in concentration from an equilibrium value or the Gibbs Free Energy of reaction. It is shown that these models fail to capture some important aspects of carbonate mineral growth rates. Next‐generation models in development are those that reflect the processes that occur on a mineral surface while it is growing, not just the concentration of dissolved species. While incomplete, these process‐based models are already addressing some long‐standing questions in geochemistry and are enhancing the accuracy and robustness of the predictive ability for calcite precipitation. Lastly, the importance of the step density, analogous to the reactive site density in a natural sample, is shown. The factors that may influence the step density are described and the potentially complex relationship between step density and solution conditions is presented. While still in development, these models suggest that many of the historical problems in quantitative prediction of mineral growth and dissolution reactions can be resolved.
Suggested Citation
Andrew G. Stack, 2014.
"Next generation models of carbonate mineral growth and dissolution,"
Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 4(3), pages 278-288, June.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:greenh:v:4:y:2014:i:3:p:278-288
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:4:y:2014:i:3:p:278-288. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2152-3878 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.