IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/greenh/v4y2014i1p66-80.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Storage compliance in coupled CO 2 ‐EOR and storage

Author

Listed:
  • Amin Ettehad

Abstract

CO 2 storage compliance refers to the safe and consistent storage of a captured anthropogenic CO 2 slug in an underground geological structure. This paper investigates the storage compliance in coupled CO 2 enhanced oil recovery (EOR) and storage projects. Storage compliance requires an oilfield operator to maintain sufficient CO 2 injection and storage capacities throughout an industrial‐scale CO 2 capture and EOR‐storage operation. We investigate the uncertainty in two operational parameters that may raise a compliance consideration: annual captured CO 2 from the power plant and CO 2 injection loss in the oilfield. The objective is to maintain sufficient CO 2 injection and storage capacities and maximize the economic benefits from the EOR‐storage operation. We formulate and optimize the storage compliance problem using the method of optimization with Monte Carlo simulation. The results show that appropriate adjustment of the water‐alternating‐gas (WAG) ratio increases both the compliance and the economic benefits. Also, a CO 2 storage back‐up in a saline aquifer allows the oilfield operator to implement more profitable EOR‐storage designs. A risk‐seeking operator may practice the saline aquifer back‐up option to simultaneously maximize the benefits and mitigate the risk of storage capacity shortage. Finally, EOR‐storage operation is less efficient than aquifer storage in terms of storage efficiency, and considerably more profitable in terms of tangible economic benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Amin Ettehad, 2014. "Storage compliance in coupled CO 2 ‐EOR and storage," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 4(1), pages 66-80, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:4:y:2014:i:1:p:66-80
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1002/ghg.1382
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tapia, John Frederick D. & Lee, Jui-Yuan & Ooi, Raymond E.H. & Foo, Dominic C.Y. & Tan, Raymond R., 2016. "Optimal CO2 allocation and scheduling in enhanced oil recovery (EOR) operations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 337-345.
    2. Chen, Siyuan & Liu, Jiangfeng & Zhang, Qi & Teng, Fei & McLellan, Benjamin C., 2022. "A critical review on deployment planning and risk analysis of carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) toward carbon neutrality," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    3. Abdoli, B. & Hooshmand, F. & MirHassani, S.A., 2023. "A novel stochastic programming model under endogenous uncertainty for the CCS-EOR planning problem," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 338(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:4:y:2014:i:1:p:66-80. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2152-3878 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.