IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/greenh/v3y2013i6p431-446.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparison of water chemistry from a CO 2 ‐enhanced oil recovery project with reactive transport modeling of CO 2 injection into a carbonate reservoir

Author

Listed:
  • Maurice Shevalier
  • Michael Nightingale
  • Chantsalmaa Dalkhaa
  • Bernhard Mayer

Abstract

A long‐term geochemical monitoring program was conducted at a CO 2 ‐enhanced oil recovery site in central Alberta (Canada) to examine geological storage of CO 2 . The program included geochemical monitoring of reservoir brines, a mineralogical study, and using TOUGHREACT to compare model and field observations. CO 2 was injected into a highly permeable carbonate reservoir at 78 tonnes/day for 2.5 years. Fluid and gas samples were obtained for geochemical characterization before, during, and 1.4 years after injection from a production well ∼915 m from the injection well at a depth of ∼936 m. Downhole water compositions were calculated using SOLMINEQ88 and compared to predictions from TOUGHREACT. Following CO 2 breakthrough after ∼23 months, downhole pH decreased, HCO 3 -super-−; and calcium concentrations increased, while magnesium concentrations changed marginally, indicating solubility and ionic trapping were occurring simultaneously. Trends in analyzed and modeled species were similar, but concentration levels were different. Calibrating the model to achieve better correlation between results was attempted but proved unsuccessful. The variances were likely caused by differences between ideal and reservoir mineral's kinetic parameters, surface area, thermodynamic parameters and sampling technique. Five‐hundred‐year simulations showed the CO 2 plume migrating vertically due to capillary forces with no significant change in gas saturation below the caprock over the post‐injection period. The majority of CO 2 remained trapped as a supercritical phase as the reservoir is composed of only carbonate minerals. The low reactivity of the reservoir is positive, in that the reservoir is not negatively impacted by dissolution and negative in that no mineral trapping occurs. © 2013 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

Suggested Citation

  • Maurice Shevalier & Michael Nightingale & Chantsalmaa Dalkhaa & Bernhard Mayer, 2013. "A comparison of water chemistry from a CO 2 ‐enhanced oil recovery project with reactive transport modeling of CO 2 injection into a carbonate reservoir," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 3(6), pages 431-446, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:3:y:2013:i:6:p:431-446
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1002/ghg.1372
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:3:y:2013:i:6:p:431-446. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2152-3878 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.