Author
Listed:
- Liu Bin
- Li Kaixuan
- Yu Zhipeng
- Wang Zaizhou
- Chen Wenjun
Abstract
Pipelines stand as the most cost‐effective method for large‐scale transportation of CO2 from a source point to the storage site, especially over extensive distances. The potential for crack propagation following a pipeline rupture highlights the need for precise analysis of decompression wave propagation. To accurately model this, understanding the decompression wave's propagation laws becomes imperative. Although previous studies have predominantly focused on pipeline leaks within the dense phase or supercritical state, the transition from liquid to gas during leakage significantly affects the decompression wave propagation. When a gaseous CO2 pipeline ruptures, the high Joule‐–Thomson coefficient causes a swift temperature plunge, potentially leading to a gas–liquid transition. However, research on how this phase transition impacts the decompression wave characteristics is limited. To address this gap, this study proposes a transition computational fluid dynamics model to predict the decompression wave behavior. The model is validated with an industrial‐scale full‐bore rupture experiment. The results reveal that the gaseous CO2 leakage induces a pressure plateau at a certain distance from the leakage due to the gas‐liquid phase transition. The influences of initial conditions on this pressure plateau and decompression wave are also explored. This study provides valuable insights into understanding the decompression wave behaviors of gaseous CO2 pipelines, which are essential for ensuring the safety and reliability of CO2 transportation within the carbon capture and storage technology chain. © 2024 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Suggested Citation
Liu Bin & Li Kaixuan & Yu Zhipeng & Wang Zaizhou & Chen Wenjun, 2024.
"A study on decompression wave propagation characteristics during CO2 pipeline leakage with consideration of gas‐liquid transition,"
Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 14(4), pages 575-586, August.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:greenh:v:14:y:2024:i:4:p:575-586
DOI: 10.1002/ghg.2283
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:14:y:2024:i:4:p:575-586. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2152-3878 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.