Author
Listed:
- Atuman Samaila Joel
- Umar Farouk Aliyu
- Olumide Olu Olubajo
- Yusuf Makarfi Isa
Abstract
Modeling of CO2 removal in a rotating packed bed using a mixed amine solution of piperazine and methyldiethanolamine with various molar concentration ratios was done with Aspen Plus® and dynamically linked with Intel® Visual Fortran. In addition to the mass and energy balances, all the necessary correlations for the rotating packed bed were written in Intel® Visual Fortran. The developed model was validated, and the result showed good agreement with a percentage error of less than 10%. The model was scaled‐up to absorb CO2 from the flue gas composition of a typical 6.4 MWe biomass power plant with the goal of producing net negative CO2 emissions. The effect of process parameters such as temperature, rotation speed, liquid‐gas ratio, methyl diethanolamine concentration, and piperazine concentration on capture efficiency and regeneration energy was investigated. It was discovered that increasing the rotational speed results in an improvement in the separation efficiency. Increasing the temperature of the lean solvent causes a decrease in separation efficiency, which is due to a decrease in solubility as the temperature increases. Increasing the liquid‐to‐gas ratio leads to an increase in CO2 absorption efficiency because more hydroxide ions are present to react with the CO2. Piperazine is a reactive compound and increasing its concentration in the mixed solvent leads to an increase in CO2 absorption efficiency. Finally, the results of the study demonstrated that a solvent mixture consisting of piperazine and methyldiethanolamine has the potential to be utilized in post‐combustion CO2 capture using rotating packed bed technology. © 2024 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Suggested Citation
Atuman Samaila Joel & Umar Farouk Aliyu & Olumide Olu Olubajo & Yusuf Makarfi Isa, 2024.
"Performance study on mixed solvent for post‐combustion carbon capture using rotating packed bed technology,"
Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 14(3), pages 400-410, June.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:greenh:v:14:y:2024:i:3:p:400-410
DOI: 10.1002/ghg.2280
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:14:y:2024:i:3:p:400-410. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2152-3878 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.