IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/greenh/v12y2022i5p583-586.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lessons learned from a carbon dioxide huff and puff field test in a tight reservoir

Author

Listed:
  • Chang Hong Gao
  • Wei Li

Abstract

Carbon dioxide has been proved to be an effect agent to enhance oil recovery. CO2 huff and puff is a very appealing technique in tight fields where water flooding is difficult. Two horizontal wells in a tight field in Northeast China received carbon dioxide injection. One well achieved good results, but the other well failed to show positive response. Possible causes of failure are analyzed, and suggestions are made for future projects. © 2022 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Chang Hong Gao & Wei Li, 2022. "Lessons learned from a carbon dioxide huff and puff field test in a tight reservoir," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 12(5), pages 583-586, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:12:y:2022:i:5:p:583-586
    DOI: 10.1002/ghg.2180
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/ghg.2180
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/ghg.2180?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:12:y:2022:i:5:p:583-586. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2152-3878 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.