Author
Listed:
- Yuannan Zheng
- Bingyou Jiang
- Bo Ren
- Hanyi Lin
- Wenhan Tao
- Shijv Wang
Abstract
In this work, the high‐pressure methane adsorption/desorption tests were conducted in four coal samples (from low‐rank bituminous coal to anthracite) under different temperature and pressure conditions to reveal the mechanism of desorption hysteresis effect in the deep‐buried coal seams. The experimental and fitting results show that the presence of free methane molecules in the adsorption phase results in an obvious difference between the measured methane adsorption amount with the actual adsorption capacity. The Langmuir, Langmuir–Freundlich (L–F) and Dubinin–Astakhov (D–A) models have their own advantages and disadvantages in fitting the experimental adsorption/desorption data. As residual adsorption capacity C fitted by the D–A model would be negative at high temperatures and lose the meaning of the constant, the Langmuir model is more suitable to describe methane desorption process. The residual adsorption capacity fitted by Langmuir model tended to decrease as the temperature increased until it is almost completely desorbed at 373 K. Meanwhile, because the adsorption sites with lower energy are gradually occupied by methane molecules in the high‐pressure stage, intermolecular forces increased and methane molecules are more easily desorbed. Therefore, the desorption hysteresis coefficient trends to increase exponentially with the decrease of pressure and temperature, which indicated that the original gas content of the coal seams may decrease with the increase of the burial depth, but the risk of coal and gas outburst accidents may increase. © 2022 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Suggested Citation
Yuannan Zheng & Bingyou Jiang & Bo Ren & Hanyi Lin & Wenhan Tao & Shijv Wang, 2022.
"Evaluation and analysis of methane adsorption capacity in deep‐buried coal seams,"
Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 12(3), pages 376-393, June.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:greenh:v:12:y:2022:i:3:p:376-393
DOI: 10.1002/ghg.2149
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:12:y:2022:i:3:p:376-393. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2152-3878 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.