IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/greenh/v11y2021i4p750-763.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk assessment on the CCUS project using risk breakdown structure methodology: A case study on Jilin oilfield CO2‐EOR Hei‐79 block

Author

Listed:
  • Hongying Lv
  • Luochun Wang
  • Guizhen Liu
  • Ziyang Lou
  • Lingyun Pang
  • Bofeng Cai
  • Qi Li

Abstract

The risk potential matrix method can be used as a reference for the optimization of the traditional risk matrix in geological CO2 storage. This study used monitoring data for environmentally sensitive receptors in the Jilin Oilfield CO2‐enhanced oil recovery (CO2‐EOR) Hei‐79 block in conjunction with a hazard event store to create an updated risk assessment of CO2 capture, use, and storage (CCUS) as a guide for risk management. The assessment built upon the overall project operation status to evaluate six and five sub‐categories of hazard and sensitivity, respectively. The environmental sensitivity threshold integrated ecosystems and secondary geological disasters to amplify potential risks. The results of the risk assessment of the CO2‐EOR Hei‐79 block in the Jilin Oilfield showed that despite an overall risk level of Ⅱ, the hazard level resulted in an unacceptable increase in overall risk. Formations are usually stimulated by fracturing in Jilin Oilfield, particularly for oil and gas production. © 2021 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Hongying Lv & Luochun Wang & Guizhen Liu & Ziyang Lou & Lingyun Pang & Bofeng Cai & Qi Li, 2021. "Risk assessment on the CCUS project using risk breakdown structure methodology: A case study on Jilin oilfield CO2‐EOR Hei‐79 block," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 11(4), pages 750-763, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:11:y:2021:i:4:p:750-763
    DOI: 10.1002/ghg.2077
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/ghg.2077
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/ghg.2077?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Srikanta Mishra & Autumn Haagsma & Manoj Valluri & Neeraj Gupta, 2020. "Assessment of CO2‐enhanced oil recovery and associated geologic storage potential in the Michigan Northern Pinnacle Reef Trend," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 10(1), pages 32-49, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chen, Siyuan & Liu, Jiangfeng & Zhang, Qi & Teng, Fei & McLellan, Benjamin C., 2022. "A critical review on deployment planning and risk analysis of carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) toward carbon neutrality," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liang Xu & Qi Li & Matthew Myers & Yongsheng Tan & Miao He & Happiness Ijeoma Umeobi & Xiaochun Li, 2021. "The effects of porosity and permeability changes on simulated supercritical CO2 migration front in tight glutenite under different effective confining pressures from 1.5 MPa to 21.5 MPa," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 11(1), pages 19-36, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:11:y:2021:i:4:p:750-763. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2152-3878 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.