Author
Listed:
- Mohamed Abdelaal
- Mehdi Zeidouni
- Ian J. Duncan
Abstract
For large‐scale CO2 geological storage (CGS) in deep saline aquifers, storing maximum possible amounts of CO2 over the project period is desirable. The ultimate storage capacity of a potential storage site is evidently a function of the static formation characteristics (e.g., formation porosity and thickness). However, it can be dramatically changed by the injectivity variations caused by the dynamic practices utilized during CO2 injection. Proper management of a CGS project implies operating the injection well at the optimal well operating condition or injection scheme that ensure optimal injectivity and hence improved ultimate storage capacity. Practically, the operating condition of the injection well is partly controlled by the amount of CO2 supplied by the emission source (e.g., power plant), which results in inevitable fluctuations/shut‐downs during the operation. In this work, we investigate the effect of different operating conditions of the injection well on the injectivity and the ultimate storage capacity of the aquifer. With CO2 injected continuously or intermittently, constant terminal‐rate and constant terminal‐pressure well operating conditions are studied. Next, we provide a simple net‐present value (NPV) analysis to evaluate the economic feasibility of adopting different injection schemes. The results are applied to a synthetic CGS project with injection history to investigate their implications. Finally, we present a sensitivity analysis to test the effect of varying the injection rate, the vertical permeability, and the formation dip angle on the dynamic storage capacity. © 2021 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Suggested Citation
Mohamed Abdelaal & Mehdi Zeidouni & Ian J. Duncan, 2021.
"Effects of injection well operation conditions on CO2 storage capacity in deep saline aquifers,"
Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 11(4), pages 734-749, August.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:greenh:v:11:y:2021:i:4:p:734-749
DOI: 10.1002/ghg.2076
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:11:y:2021:i:4:p:734-749. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2152-3878 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.