IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/greenh/v11y2021i2p277-296.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of geological models for the simulation of CO2 migration: a case study in Ordos, China

Author

Listed:
  • Siwen Wang
  • Yibo Wang
  • Yikang Zheng
  • Xu Chang
  • Jun Li
  • Rongshu Zeng

Abstract

At the deep saline‐aquifer level, geological storage of CO2 is considered to be one of the most effective geological methods for reducing greenhouse gas concentrations and emissions. The objective of this study is to compare the performance of different geological models in simulating CO2 storage as part of the Ordos Shenhua project, which is the first and the largest demonstration project in China. The project has injected 300 000 t of CO2 into low‐permeability saline aquifers at a depth of 1600 m. The injection procedure began in May 2011 and ended in April 2015. We studied the impact of different models on the predicted gas saturation distribution of the CO2 plume 50 years after well shutoff, using the CO2STORE module in the Eclipse E300 simulator. In our simulation comparisons, four 3D geological models are established, including the flat constant model, flat sequential Gaussian model, seismic constant model, and seismic sequential Gaussian model. The seismic sequential Gaussian model is the most precise model, which is established through the sequential Gaussian co‐simulation method under the constraints of the seismic profile. Actual monitoring data were applied for historical pressure fitting in the four different geological models. Through the comparison of the four models, it can be concluded that the seismic sequential Gaussian model simulated CO2 migration more effectively. The results of this project can provide support for safety assessments in the later stages of deep monitoring programs. © 2021 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Siwen Wang & Yibo Wang & Yikang Zheng & Xu Chang & Jun Li & Rongshu Zeng, 2021. "Comparison of geological models for the simulation of CO2 migration: a case study in Ordos, China," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 11(2), pages 277-296, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:11:y:2021:i:2:p:277-296
    DOI: 10.1002/ghg.2048
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/ghg.2048
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/ghg.2048?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jing, Jing & Yang, Yanlin & Cheng, Jianmei & Ding, Zhaojing & Wang, Dandan & Jing, Xianwen, 2023. "Analysis of the effect of formation dip angle and injection pressure on the injectivity and migration of CO2 during storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:11:y:2021:i:2:p:277-296. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2152-3878 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.