IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/greenh/v10y2020i2p296-312.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of brine salinity on the geological sequestration of CO2 in a deep saline carbonate formation

Author

Listed:
  • Ram Kumar
  • Scott Campbell
  • Eric Sonnenthal
  • Jeffrey Cunningham

Abstract

When supercritical CO2 is injected into a deep saline aquifer, the salinity of the brine can influence both the solubility of the injected CO2 in the brine and the subsequent aqueous geochemical reactions that occur. The objective of this study is to assess the effect of brine salinity on CO2 storage in deep saline carbonate formations. Specifically, the study aims to quantitatively assess the effect of brine salinity on (a) the amount of CO2 that can be sequestered in the aqueous phase, (b) the storage efficiency of the repository, (c) the change in pH of the residual brine after dissolution of CO2, and (d) changes in the mineralogy and porosity of the rock matrix that result from mineral dissolution and precipitation reactions induced by CO2 injection. Injection of CO2 into a model layered carbonate formation was simulated using the reactive‐transport code TOUGHREACT 3.3. The simulations consisted of 50 years of injection into a partially completed injection well, followed by 50 years of equilibration (no injection). Salinity of the brine was varied between 1% and 15% to determine the effects of salinity. Because the solubility of CO2 decreases as the salinity of the brine increases, an increase in brine salinity from 1% to 15% resulted in a 19% decrease in storage efficiency and a 25% decrease in the mass of CO2 dissolved in the aqueous phase. However, despite the strong effect of brine salinity on CO2 dissolution, there was almost no effect of salinity on the pH change in the residual brine: the chemical activity coefficient of the dissolved CO2 increases with brine salinity, counteracting the effects of decreased solubility. Consequently, brine salinity had little effect on mineral dissolution or precipitation, or on changes in formation porosity. The study therefore helps to choose sequestration sites depending upon the salinity of the brine: lower salinity results in more solubility trapping and better storage efficiency without noticeable differences in pH drop or mineral dissolution. © 2020 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Ram Kumar & Scott Campbell & Eric Sonnenthal & Jeffrey Cunningham, 2020. "Effect of brine salinity on the geological sequestration of CO2 in a deep saline carbonate formation," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 10(2), pages 296-312, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:10:y:2020:i:2:p:296-312
    DOI: 10.1002/ghg.1960
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/ghg.1960
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/ghg.1960?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liwei Zhang & Robert M. Dilmore & Grant S. Bromhal, 2016. "Effect of outer boundary condition, reservoir size, and CO 2 effective permeability on pressure and CO 2 saturation predictions under carbon sequestration conditions," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 6(4), pages 546-560, August.
    2. Emad A. Al†Khdheeawi & Stephanie Vialle & Ahmed Barifcani & Mohammad Sarmadivaleh & Yihuai Zhang & Stefan Iglauer, 2018. "Impact of salinity on CO2 containment security in highly heterogeneous reservoirs," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 8(1), pages 93-105, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alsedik Abousif & David Wronkiewicz & Abdelmoniem Masoud, 2024. "Geochemical assessment of mineral sequestration of carbon dioxide in the midcontinent rift," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 14(2), pages 295-318, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jing, Jing & Yang, Yanlin & Tang, Zhonghua, 2021. "Assessing the influence of injection temperature on CO2 storage efficiency and capacity in the sloping formation with fault," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(PA).
    2. Emad A. Al†Khdheeawi & Stephanie Vialle & Ahmed Barifcani & Mohammad Sarmadivaleh & Yihuai Zhang & Stefan Iglauer, 2018. "Impact of salinity on CO2 containment security in highly heterogeneous reservoirs," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 8(1), pages 93-105, February.
    3. Liwei Zhang & Robert Dilmore & Nicolas Huerta & Yee Soong & Veronika Vasylkivska & Argha Namhata & Yan Wang & Xiaochun Li, 2018. "Application of a new reduced‐complexity assessment tool to estimate CO2 and brine leakage from reservoir and above‐zone monitoring interval (AZMI) through an abandoned well under geologic carbon stora," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 8(5), pages 839-853, October.
    4. Vo Thanh, Hung & Yasin, Qamar & Al-Mudhafar, Watheq J. & Lee, Kang-Kun, 2022. "Knowledge-based machine learning techniques for accurate prediction of CO2 storage performance in underground saline aquifers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:10:y:2020:i:2:p:296-312. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2152-3878 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.