IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/envmet/v26y2015i6p431-441.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficient and automatic methods for flexible regression on spatiotemporal data, with applications to groundwater monitoring

Author

Listed:
  • L. Evers
  • D. A. Molinari
  • A. W. Bowman
  • W. R. Jones
  • M. J. Spence

Abstract

Fitting statistical models to spatiotemporal data requires finding the right balance between imposing smoothness and following the data. In the context of P‐splines, we propose a Bayesian framework for choosing the smoothing parameter, which allows the construction of fully automatic data‐driven methods for fitting flexible models to spatiotemporal data. An implementation, which is highly computationally efficient and exploits the sparsity of the design and penalty matrices, is proposed. The findings are illustrated using a simulation study and two examples, all concerned with the modelling of contaminants in groundwater. This suggests that the proposed strategy is more stable that competing methods based on the use of criteria such as generalised cross‐validation and Akaike's Information Criterion. © 2015 The Authors. Environmetrics Published by John Wiley Sons Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • L. Evers & D. A. Molinari & A. W. Bowman & W. R. Jones & M. J. Spence, 2015. "Efficient and automatic methods for flexible regression on spatiotemporal data, with applications to groundwater monitoring," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(6), pages 431-441, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:envmet:v:26:y:2015:i:6:p:431-441
    DOI: 10.1002/env.2347
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/env.2347
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/env.2347?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Earl W Duncan & Kerrie L Mengersen, 2020. "Comparing Bayesian spatial models: Goodness-of-smoothing criteria for assessing under- and over-smoothing," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-28, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:envmet:v:26:y:2015:i:6:p:431-441. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/1180-4009/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.