IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/empleg/v4y2007i4p677-713.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What's in a Standard Form Contract? An Empirical Analysis of Software License Agreements

Author

Listed:
  • Florencia Marotta‐Wurgler

Abstract

The vast majority of commercial transactions are governed by standard form contracts, but little is known about their actual content and the determinants of that content. This article provides a comprehensive empirical analysis of an important class of modern standard form contracts—software license agreements. In a sample of 647 licenses for software from various markets, I document the prevalence of terms relating to license acceptance, license scope, limitations on transfer, warranties, limitations on liability, maintenance and support, and conflict resolution. I find that almost all licenses display a net bias, relative to relevant default rules, in favor of the software company (the contract writer). I also investigate firm‐ and buyer‐type determinants of the net bias. Larger and (controlling for size) younger firms offer more one‐sided terms. Firms offer similar terms to both business buyers and members of the general public. In addition to providing new insight about the nature of standard form contracts, the results may inform efforts to draft new default rules to govern software transactions.

Suggested Citation

  • Florencia Marotta‐Wurgler, 2007. "What's in a Standard Form Contract? An Empirical Analysis of Software License Agreements," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 4(4), pages 677-713, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:empleg:v:4:y:2007:i:4:p:677-713
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2007.00104.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2007.00104.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2007.00104.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:empleg:v:4:y:2007:i:4:p:677-713. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1740-1461 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.