IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/empleg/v4y2007i2p331-363.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lay Assessors of German Administrative Courts: Fairness, Power‐Distance Orientation, and Deliberation Activity

Author

Listed:
  • Stefan Machura

Abstract

German administrative courts employ lay assessors who decide cases together with professional judges. The mixed court is comprised of three professional judges and two lay assessors and decisions require a simple majority. This article compares the experience of East and West German lay assessors using samples from two provinces. The two groups did not differ substantially in their self‐reported participation during deliberations. Issues of distributive and procedural fairness are crucial for the way lay assessors experience their work. Lay assessors disagree with professional judges more often when their sense of justice is at issue. Lay assessors are most successful when the professional judges treat them as equal partners. Female lay assessors participated less frequently than males but this was not an effect of gender distribution in the tribunal. Differences in formal education did not help explain deliberation activity. Respondents with “high” power‐distance orientation (social distance between those in power and those who are to obey) less often disagreed with professional judges. This high orientation is more frequent in the East. In addition to these specific factors, the institutional setting is a most important factor affecting the experience of the lay assessors.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefan Machura, 2007. "Lay Assessors of German Administrative Courts: Fairness, Power‐Distance Orientation, and Deliberation Activity," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 4(2), pages 331-363, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:empleg:v:4:y:2007:i:2:p:331-363
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2007.00091.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2007.00091.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2007.00091.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stéphane Esquerré, 2019. "Court structure and legal efficiency, the case of French échevinage in bankruptcy courts," Working Papers hal-02305492, HAL.
    2. Kuo‐Chang Huang & Chang‐Ching Lin, 2013. "Rescuing Confidence in the Judicial System: Introducing Lay Participation in Taiwan," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(3), pages 542-569, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:empleg:v:4:y:2007:i:2:p:331-363. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1740-1461 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.