IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/empleg/v18y2021i1p131-166.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Medical Malpractice and Physician Discipline: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly

Author

Listed:
  • David A. Hyman
  • Mohammad Rahmati
  • Bernard Black

Abstract

We study the overlap between the medical malpractice (med mal) and medical disciplinary systems using the records of almost 90,000 Illinois physicians who held an active license at any point from 1990–2016. We quantify the specialty‐specific risk of having a paid med mal claim or a disciplinary action; how many physicians have both; and the extent to which physicians with two or more paid claims or two or more disciplinary actions account for a disproportionate share of the activity of both systems. We also examine which factors are associated with paid claims and disciplinary actions, and whether physicians with multiple paid claims or disciplinary actions are concentrated at particular hospitals. Physicians with two or more paid claims account for only 2.37 percent of all licensed physicians, but they account for 53 percent of paid claims and payouts. Physicians with two or more disciplinary actions account for only 0.47 percent of physicians but 28 percent of all disciplinary actions. The risk of paid claims and disciplinary actions varies greatly by specialty. Physicians who attended non‐U.S. medical schools are more likely to have paid claims but (except for high‐disciplinary‐risk specialties) are not more likely to be subject to disciplinary action. Physicians with prior paid claims are more likely to be the target of disciplinary action—but not vice versa. A small number of Illinois hospitals are staffed by physicians with unusually high numbers of paid med mal claims, disciplinary actions, or both.

Suggested Citation

  • David A. Hyman & Mohammad Rahmati & Bernard Black, 2021. "Medical Malpractice and Physician Discipline: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(1), pages 131-166, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:empleg:v:18:y:2021:i:1:p:131-166
    DOI: 10.1111/jels.12277
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12277
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jels.12277?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Myungho Paik & Bernard Black & David A. Hyman, 2013. "The Receding Tide of Medical Malpractice Litigation: Part 1—National Trends," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(4), pages 612-638, December.
    2. Black, Bernard & Hyman, David A. & Lerner, Joshua Y., 2019. "Physicians with multiple paid medical malpractice claims: Are they outliers or just unlucky?," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 146-157.
    3. Jing Liu & David A. Hyman, 2019. "Targeting Bad Doctors: Lessons from Indiana, 1975–2015," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(2), pages 248-280, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kyle Rozema, 2021. "Does the Bar Exam Protect the Public?," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(4), pages 801-848, December.
    2. David A. Hyman & Jing Liu & Bernard S. Black, 2022. "Should patients use online reviews to pick their doctors and hospitals?," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(4), pages 897-935, December.
    3. Kowsar Yousefi & Bernard Black & David A. Hyman, 2023. "Paid medical malpractice claims: How strongly does the past predict the future?," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(4), pages 818-851, December.
    4. Jing Liu & David A. Hyman, 2021. "Physician Licensing and Discipline: Lessons From Indiana," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(3), pages 629-659, September.
    5. Black, Bernard & Traczynski, Jeffrey & Udalova, Victoria, 2022. "How Do Insurers Price Medical Malpractice Insurance?," IZA Discussion Papers 15392, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kowsar Yousefi & Bernard Black & David A. Hyman, 2023. "Paid medical malpractice claims: How strongly does the past predict the future?," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(4), pages 818-851, December.
    2. Hao Yu & Olesya Baker, 2022. "Do noneconomic damage caps reduce medical malpractice insurance premiums? Evidence from North Carolina," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 25(2), pages 201-218, June.
    3. Zabinski, Zenon & Black, Bernard S., 2022. "The deterrent effect of tort law: Evidence from medical malpractice reform," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    4. Theodore Eisenberg & Christoph Engel, 2014. "Assuring Civil Damages Adequately Deter: A Public Good Experiment," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(2), pages 301-349, June.
    5. Andrew I. Friedson, 2017. "Medical Malpractice Damage Caps and Provider Reimbursement," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(1), pages 118-135, January.
    6. Kyle Rozema, 2021. "Does the Bar Exam Protect the Public?," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(4), pages 801-848, December.
    7. Jing Liu & David A. Hyman, 2021. "Physician Licensing and Discipline: Lessons From Indiana," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(3), pages 629-659, September.
    8. Black, Bernard & Hyman, David A. & Lerner, Joshua Y., 2019. "Physicians with multiple paid medical malpractice claims: Are they outliers or just unlucky?," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 146-157.
    9. Black, Bernard & Traczynski, Jeffrey & Udalova, Victoria, 2022. "How Do Insurers Price Medical Malpractice Insurance?," IZA Discussion Papers 15392, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    10. David A. Hyman & Jing Liu & Bernard S. Black, 2022. "Should patients use online reviews to pick their doctors and hospitals?," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(4), pages 897-935, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:empleg:v:18:y:2021:i:1:p:131-166. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1740-1461 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.