IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/emjrnl/v21y2018i2p170-191.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Central limit theorems for conditional efficiency measures and tests of the ‘separability’ condition in non‐parametric, two‐stage models of production

Author

Listed:
  • Cinzia Daraio
  • Léopold Simar
  • Paul W. Wilson

Abstract

In this paper, we demonstrate that standard central limit theorem (CLT) results do not hold for means of non‐parametric, conditional efficiency estimators, and we provide new CLTs that permit applied researchers to make valid inference about mean conditional efficiency or to compare mean efficiency across groups of producers. The new CLTs are used to develop a test of the restrictive ‘separability’ condition that is necessary for second‐stage regressions of efficiency estimates on environmental variables. We show that if this condition is violated, not only are second‐stage regressions difficult to interpret and perhaps meaningless, but also first‐stage, unconditional efficiency estimates are misleading. As such, the test developed here is of fundamental importance to applied researchers using non‐parametric methods for efficiency estimation. The test is shown to be consistent and its local power is examined. Our simulation results indicate that our tests perform well both in terms of size and power. We provide a real‐world empirical example by re‐examining the paper by Aly et al. (1990, Review of Economics and Statistics 72, 211–18) and rejecting the separability assumption implicitly assumed by Aly et al., calling into question results that appear in hundreds of papers that have been published in recent years.

Suggested Citation

  • Cinzia Daraio & Léopold Simar & Paul W. Wilson, 2018. "Central limit theorems for conditional efficiency measures and tests of the ‘separability’ condition in non‐parametric, two‐stage models of production," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 21(2), pages 170-191, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:emjrnl:v:21:y:2018:i:2:p:170-191
    DOI: 10.1111/ectj.12103
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ectj.12103
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ectj.12103?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:emjrnl:v:21:y:2018:i:2:p:170-191. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/resssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.