IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/emetrp/v93y2025i2p661-694.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Statics With Adjustment Costs and the Le Chatelier Principle

Author

Listed:
  • Eddie Dekel
  • John K.‐H. Quah
  • Ludvig Sinander

Abstract

We develop a theory of monotone comparative statics for models with adjustment costs. We show that comparative‐statics conclusions may be drawn under the usual ordinal complementarity assumptions on the objective function, assuming very little about costs: only a mild monotonicity condition is required. We use this insight to prove a general Le Chatelier principle: under the ordinal complementarity assumptions, if short‐run adjustment is subject to a monotone cost, then the long‐run response to a shock is greater than the short‐run response. We extend these results to a fully dynamic model of adjustment over time: the Le Chatelier principle remains valid, and under slightly stronger assumptions, optimal adjustment follows a monotone path. We apply our results to models of saving, production, pricing, labor supply, and investment.

Suggested Citation

  • Eddie Dekel & John K.‐H. Quah & Ludvig Sinander, 2025. "Comparative Statics With Adjustment Costs and the Le Chatelier Principle," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 93(2), pages 661-694, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:emetrp:v:93:y:2025:i:2:p:661-694
    DOI: 10.3982/ECTA22841
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA22841
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3982/ECTA22841?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:emetrp:v:93:y:2025:i:2:p:661-694. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/essssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.