IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/emetrp/v93y2025i1p161-194.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Well Does Bargaining Work in Consumer Markets? A Robust Bounds Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Joachim Freyberger
  • Bradley J. Larsen

Abstract

This study provides a structural analysis of detailed, alternating‐offer bargaining data from eBay, deriving bounds on buyers and sellers private value distributions and the gains from trade using a range of assumptions on behavior and the informational environment. These assumptions range from weak (assuming only that acceptance and rejection decisions are rational) to less weak (e.g., assuming that bargaining offers are weakly increasing in players' private values). We estimate the bounds and show what they imply for consumer negotiation behavior and inefficient breakdown. For the median product, bargaining ends in impasse in 37% of negotiations even when the buyer values the good more than the seller.

Suggested Citation

  • Joachim Freyberger & Bradley J. Larsen, 2025. "How Well Does Bargaining Work in Consumer Markets? A Robust Bounds Approach," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 93(1), pages 161-194, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:emetrp:v:93:y:2025:i:1:p:161-194
    DOI: 10.3982/ECTA20125
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA20125
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3982/ECTA20125?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:emetrp:v:93:y:2025:i:1:p:161-194. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/essssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.