Author
Listed:
- Hope Mimbs
- Anne E. Barrett
- Brianna Soulie
- Jessica Noblitt
- Cherish Michael
Abstract
The increasing frequency and severity of hurricanes induced by climate change, heighten the importance of understanding the emergency preparedness and needs of older adults with disabilities. This segment of the population faces an elevated risk of injury or death in hurricanes and other weather‐related emergencies, but little is known about their preparation for and evacuation intentions regarding such emergencies. Even less is known about communities' readiness to address older adults with disabilities' needs during emergencies. We examine hurricane readiness at the individual level using data from an online survey of Floridians aged 50 and older (n = 3918) and at the county level using administrative data from 65 of Florida's 67 counties. Results of individual‐level analyses revealed that older adults with self‐reported mobility or vision impairments had lower odds of being hurricane prepared, suggesting they may have unmet needs in such emergencies. Results of county‐level analyses yielded mixed results. Although counties with higher proportions of their residents having limited abilities tended to have more special needs emergency shelters, counties with higher proportions of their residents using special equipment tended to have fewer—rather than more—such shelters. Our study provides insight that can inform policies aimed at safeguarding older adults with disabilities from the risks posed by the warming planet's intensifying storms. 气候变化导致飓风的发生频率和严重程度不断增加,这强调了“理解残疾老年人的应急准备和需求”一事的重要性。这部分人群在飓风和其他与天气有关的紧急情况下面临较高的受伤或死亡风险,然而,几乎没有研究聚焦于他们对此类紧急情况的准备和疏散意图。更少被关注的是,社区在这些紧急情况下对“满足残疾老年人需求”一事的准备程度。我们使用一项来自佛罗里达州50岁及以上居民(n = 3,918)的网络调查数据,在个人层面上研究了飓风准备情况,并使用佛罗里达州67个县中的65个县的行政数据,在县级层面上研究了飓风准备情况。个人层面的分析结果显示,自称行动不便或视力受损的老年人在作好飓风准备方面的几率较低,这表明他们在这种紧急情况下可能有未满足的需求。县级分析的结果喜忧参半。虽然“能力有限的居民比例较高”的县往往拥有更多的特殊需求紧急避难所,但“使用特殊设备的居民比例较高”的县往往拥有更少的此类避难所,而不是更多。本研究提供的见解能提供政策参考,旨在保护残疾老年人免受由全球变暖而加剧的风暴所带来的风险。 La creciente frecuencia y gravedad de los huracanes, inducida por el cambio climático, aumenta la importancia de comprender la preparación y las necesidades de emergencia de los adultos mayores con discapacidades. Este segmento de la población enfrenta un riesgo elevado de lesiones o muerte en huracanes y otras emergencias relacionadas con el clima, pero se sabe poco sobre su preparación e intenciones de evacuación con respecto a tales emergencias. Se sabe aún menos sobre la preparación de las comunidades para abordar las necesidades de los adultos mayores con discapacidades en estas emergencias. Examinamos la preparación para huracanes a nivel individual utilizando datos de una encuesta en línea de floridanos de 50 años o más (n = 3918) y a nivel de condado utilizando datos administrativos de 65 de los 67 condados de Florida. Los resultados de los análisis a nivel individual revelaron que los adultos mayores con discapacidades de movilidad o visión autoinformadas tenían menores probabilidades de estar preparados para huracanes, lo que sugiere que pueden tener necesidades no satisfechas en tales emergencias. Los resultados de los análisis a nivel de condado arrojaron resultados mixtos. Si bien los condados con una mayor proporción de residentes con capacidades limitadas tendían a tener más refugios de emergencia para necesidades especiales, los condados con una mayor proporción de residentes que utilizaban equipos especiales tendían a tener menos, en lugar de más, refugios de ese tipo. Nuestro estudio proporciona información que puede orientar las políticas destinadas a proteger a los adultos mayores con discapacidades de los riesgos que plantean las tormentas cada vez más intensas del calentamiento del planeta.
Suggested Citation
Hope Mimbs & Anne E. Barrett & Brianna Soulie & Jessica Noblitt & Cherish Michael, 2024.
"Ready for the next storm? An analysis of Florida's hurricane preparedness for its residents with disabilities,"
Journal of Elder Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(2), pages 110-121, October.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:eldpol:v:3:y:2024:i:2:p:110-121
DOI: 10.1002/jey2.12014
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:eldpol:v:3:y:2024:i:2:p:110-121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.