IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/eldpol/v2y2023i3p163-189.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Negotiating Technological Engagement: Use and Non‐Use Among Older Adults in Assisted Living

Author

Listed:
  • Jennifer L. Snyder

Abstract

Recent research on digital inequalities has shown that some individuals, including older adults, display careful consideration when deciding to use or not use technology. The purpose of this study is to explore the relationship between aging and technology use by examining not only the types of technologies used by older adults, but also how they make decisions about that use. Using semi‐structured interviews and observations of staff members, residents, and family members of residents at a privately owned, for‐profit assisted living facility in the northeast U.S., this research offers essential insights into the relationship between older adults and technology, along with the implications of that relationship on policy recommendations surrounding technology use. First, consistent with recent trends in research, the findings of this study reveal how technology use among older adults involves a complex decision‐making process. Specifically, they navigate use and non‐use by considering their skills and needs, while also managing their limitations and fears of technology. They also employ advanced mechanisms to compensate for the missed opportunities of non‐use. Treating use as a negotiated process urges policymakers and practitioners to prioritize older adults' agency when considering the implementation of technological policy and intervention. Second, I propose an Interaction Approach of Technology Use as a more nuanced way to understand older adults' technology use as it relates to the degree of independence or dependence that occurs during that use. An interactive approach allows researchers and policymakers to consider a wider range of use when examining the relationship between older adults and technology. Investigaciones recientes sobre las desigualdades digitales han demostrado que algunas personas, incluidos los adultos mayores, muestran una consideración cuidadosa cuando deciden usar o no la tecnología. El propósito de este estudio es explorar la relación entre el envejecimiento y el uso de la tecnología al examinar no solo los tipos de tecnologías que usan los adultos mayores, sino también cómo toman decisiones sobre ese uso. Mediante el uso de entrevistas semiestructuradas y observaciones de miembros del personal, residentes y familiares de residentes en un centro de vivienda asistida de propiedad privada con fines de lucro en el noreste de los EE. UU., esta investigación ofrece información esencial sobre la relación entre los adultos mayores y la tecnología, junto con las implicaciones de esa relación en las recomendaciones de políticas relacionadas con el uso de la tecnología. Primero, de acuerdo con las tendencias recientes en la investigación, los hallazgos de este estudio revelan cómo el uso de la tecnología entre los adultos mayores implica un proceso complejo de toma de decisiones. Específicamente, navegan por el uso y el no uso al considerar sus habilidades y necesidades, al mismo tiempo que manejan sus limitaciones y temores de la tecnología. También emplean mecanismos avanzados para compensar las oportunidades perdidas por la falta de uso. Tratar el uso como un proceso negociado insta a los encargados de formular políticas y a los profesionales a priorizar la agencia de los adultos mayores al considerar la implementación de políticas e intervenciones tecnológicas. En segundo lugar, propongo un enfoque de interacción del uso de la tecnología como una forma más matizada de comprender el uso de la tecnología por parte de los adultos mayores en relación con el grado de independencia o dependencia que se produce durante ese uso. Un enfoque interactivo permite a los investigadores y legisladores considerar una gama más amplia de usos al examinar la relación entre los adultos mayores y la tecnología. 关于数字不平等的近期研究表明,包括老年人在内的一些人在决定使用或不使用技术时表现出谨慎的考虑。通过分析老年人使用的技术类型以及他们如何作出技术使用的决定,本研究旨在探究老龄化与技术使用之间的关系。本研究通过对美国东北部一家私营营利性辅助生活设施的工作人员、居民、以及居民家庭成员进行半结构化访谈和观察,提供了关于老年人与技术之间的关系的重要见解,以及这种关系对有关技术使用的政策建议的启示。首先,与近期研究趋势一致的是,本研究的结果揭示了老年人的技术使用如何涉及复杂的决策过程。具体而言,老年人通过考虑自己的技能和需求来决定使用和不使用技术,同时还会管理自己对技术的限制和恐惧。他们还采用高级的机制来弥补因不使用技术而错失的机会。将技术使用视为一个协商过程,能敦促决策者和从业者在考虑实施技术政策和干预时将重点聚焦于老年人的能力。其次,我提出一种技术使用互动方法,以更细微地理解老年人的技术使用,因为这与技术使用过程中出现的独立程度或依赖程度有关。交互式方法使研究人员和决策者在研究老年人与技术之间的关系时能考虑更广泛的技术使用。

Suggested Citation

  • Jennifer L. Snyder, 2023. "Negotiating Technological Engagement: Use and Non‐Use Among Older Adults in Assisted Living," Journal of Elder Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2(3), pages 163-189, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:eldpol:v:2:y:2023:i:3:p:163-189
    DOI: 10.18278/jep.2.3.6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.18278/jep.2.3.6
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18278/jep.2.3.6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:eldpol:v:2:y:2023:i:3:p:163-189. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.