IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/eldpol/v1y2021i3p29-64.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Equity for Older Adults and Those in Congregate Sites: Lessons from the First Year of a Local Public Health COVID‐19 Response

Author

Listed:
  • Heidi Gullett

Abstract

This paper presents lessons on the equity of healthcare and health for older people that emerged from the experience of a COVID‐19 incident commander during the pandemic. The lessons include the value of ongoing investment in trustworthy cross‐sector relationships and value‐added roles for learners; the importance of working together for the common good which can provide a deep well to draw upon during a crisis; in such times, the vulnerable often become more vulnerable and need extra attention thus meeting the needs of older people requires consideration of age, disability, and congregate living status; an equity lens and cultural humility foster new opportunities for community health and systems thinking, and when balanced with on‐the‐ground work and relationships, make it possible to take on seemingly intractable problems; in order to advance community health and equity, it is vital to meet both immediate needs and to focus on strategic efforts to simultaneously transform systems and structures; developing new knowledge creates opportunities for broader sharing; interprofessional teams enable collective action in a complex problem; transparency and continuous communication are important always, but vital in a crisis; and proactive investment in public health infrastructure could mitigate a future crisis. While the pandemic produced loss and pain for millions, the transportable lessons about investing in system science, equity‐focused, cross‐sector infrastructure, and relationships can inform the future of public health and health care policy, grounded in lived experience, to inform the re‐emergence of collective efforts to foster health equity for older people and other vulnerable populations. Este documento presenta lecciones sobre la equidad de la atención médica y la salud para las personas mayores que surgieron de la experiencia de un comandante del incidente del COVID‐19 durante la pandemia. Las lecciones incluyen el valor de la inversión continua en relaciones intersectoriales confiables y roles de valor agregado para los estudiantes; la importancia de trabajar juntos por el bien común, que puede proporcionar un pozo profundo al que recurrir durante una crisis; en esos momentos, las personas vulnerables a menudo se vuelven más vulnerables y necesitan atención adicional, por lo que satisfacer las necesidades de las personas mayores requiere considerar la edad, la discapacidad y el estado de vida de la congregación; una lente de equidad y humildad cultural fomentan nuevas oportunidades para la salud comunitaria y el pensamiento sistémico, y cuando se equilibran con el trabajo y las relaciones en el terreno, hacen posible abordar problemas aparentemente insolubles; Para promover la salud y la equidad de la comunidad, es vital satisfacer las necesidades inmediatas y concentrarse en los esfuerzos estratégicos para transformar simultáneamente los sistemas y las estructuras; el desarrollo de nuevos conocimientos crea oportunidades para un intercambio más amplio; los equipos interprofesionales permiten la acción colectiva en un problema complejo; la transparencia y la comunicación continua son siempre importantes, pero vitales en una crisis; y la inversión proactiva en infraestructura de salud pública podría mitigar una crisis futura. Si bien la pandemia produjo pérdidas y dolor para millones, las lecciones transportables sobre la inversión en ciencia de sistemas, infraestructura intersectorial centrada en la equidad y las relaciones pueden informar el futuro de la salud pública y la política de atención médica, basada en la experiencia vivida, para informar al público. resurgimiento de los esfuerzos colectivos para fomentar la equidad en salud para las personas mayores y otras poblaciones vulnerables. 本文通过2019冠状病毒病(COVID‐19)大流行期间一名应急指挥员的经历,提供了有关老年人医疗公平和卫生公平的经验。经验包括:对可信赖的跨部门关系进行不断投资所带来的价值以及对学习者产生的增值作用;为能在危机期间提供储备的公共物品进行共同合作的重要性;在这类时期中,脆弱人口通常会变得更脆弱,并且需要额外的关注,因此满足老年人需求一事需要考量年龄、残障以及集体生活状况;公平的视角和文化谦逊能为社区卫生和系统思维孕育新的机遇,并且当与实际工作及关系保持平衡时,则有可能攻克棘手的问题;为提升社区卫生和公平,关键在于满足这二者的迫切需求并聚焦于战略性举措,以期同时变革系统和结构;新知识的提出,为更广的共享创造机遇;跨专业团队能在复杂问题中为集体行动创造适宜条件;透明度和持续的沟通总是重要的,但在危机中却是关键的;积极投资公共卫生基础设施,能缓解未来危机。尽管大流行为千万人带来了伤痛,但对系统科学、关注公平的跨部门基础设施及关系进行投资一事得出的普适性经验却能影响公共卫生和医疗政策的未来,基于实际经验的政策能影响集体行动的再现,以期为老年人和其他脆弱人口创造卫生公平。

Suggested Citation

  • Heidi Gullett, 2021. "Equity for Older Adults and Those in Congregate Sites: Lessons from the First Year of a Local Public Health COVID‐19 Response," Journal of Elder Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 1(3), pages 29-64, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:eldpol:v:1:y:2021:i:3:p:29-64
    DOI: 10.18278/jep.1.3.230
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.18278/jep.1.3.230
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18278/jep.1.3.230?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brandt, A.M. & Gardner, M., 2000. "Antagonism and accommodation: Interpreting the relationship between public health and medicine in the United States during the 20th century," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 90(5), pages 707-715.
    2. Monica Webb Hooper & Charlene Mitchell & Vanessa J. Marshall & Chesley Cheatham & Kristina Austin & Kimberly Sanders & Smitha Krishnamurthi & Lena L. Grafton, 2019. "Understanding Multilevel Factors Related to Urban Community Trust in Healthcare and Research," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-16, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anderson, David M. & Hoagland, Alex & Zhu, Ed, 2024. "Medical bill shock and imperfect moral hazard," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    2. Erika L. Thompson & Bettina M. Beech & Robert L. Ferrer & Lorna H. McNeil & Jasmine J. Opusunju & Rebecca A. Seguin-Fowler & Emily E. Spence & Luis Torres-Hostos & Christopher I. Amos & Palak Desai & , 2022. "Implementation of the Texas Community-Engaged Statewide Consortium for the Prevention of COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-10, October.
    3. Senier, Laura & Smollin, Leandra & Lee, Rachael & Nicoll, Lauren & Shields, Michael & Tan, Catherine, 2018. "Navigating the evidentiary turn in public health: Sensemaking strategies to integrate genomics into state-level chronic disease prevention programs," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 207-215.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:eldpol:v:1:y:2021:i:3:p:29-64. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.