IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/eldpol/v1y2020i1p137-154.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing Age‐friendly Cities: Policy Opportunities and Challenges

Author

Listed:
  • Chris Phillipson
  • Tine Buffel

Abstract

Since the mid‐2000s, the need to create age‐friendly cities and communities, meaning places where older people are actively involved, valued, and supported, has emerged as a major concern for urban policy. The World Health Organization (WHO) has driven this age‐friendly agenda through its Global Network for Age‐friendly Cities and Communities (GNAFCC). This paper reviews some of the challenges associated with the development of this policy, given the variety of economic and social pressures facing urban communities. The discussion provides background to the development of the age‐friendly model and a summary of some of the factors necessary for its successful implementation. The paper then reviews a range of key areas where age‐friendly policies might be developed, with a particular focus on issues relating to the various inequalities affecting older populations. The paper also emphasises the importance of future age‐friendly work being grounded in collaboration with the range of movements seeking to improve the quality of life of people living in cities. The paper concludes with a call for a more inclusive age‐friendly movement, one that acknowledges the full diversity of aging experiences. Desde mediados de la década de 2000, la necesidad de crear ciudades y comunidades amigables con los mayores, lo que significa lugares donde las personas mayores están activamente involucradas, valoradas y apoyadas, se ha convertido en una preocupación importante para la política urbana. La Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS) ha impulsado esta agenda amigable para las personas mayores a través de su Red Global para Ciudades y Comunidades Amigables para las Personas Mayores (GNAFCC). Este artículo revisa algunos de los desafíos asociados con el desarrollo de esta política, dada la variedad de presiones económicas y sociales que enfrentan las comunidades urbanas. La discusión proporciona antecedentes para el desarrollo del modelo amigable con la edad y un resumen de algunos de los factores necesarios para su imple‐mentación exitosa. Luego, el documento revisa una variedad de áreas clave donde se pueden desarrollar políticas amigables con la edad, con un enfoque particular en los problemas relacionados con las diversas desigualdades que afectan a las poblaciones de mayor edad. El documento también enfatiza la importancia de que el trabajo futuro favorable a la edad se base en colaboración con la gama de movimientos que buscan mejorar la calidad de vida de las personas que viven en las ciudades. El documento concluye con un llamado a un movimiento más inclusivo y amigable con la edad, uno que reconozca la diversidad completa de las experiencias de envejecimiento. 自2005年前后开始,创造老年友好型城市和社区(即老年人获得积极参与、价值和支持的地方)的需求已成为城市政策的一个主要关切。世界卫生组织(WHO)已通过其全球关爱老年城市和社区网络(GNAFCC)来推动该老年友好型议程。鉴于城市社区面临的不同经济压力和社会压力,本文审视了与该政策发展相关的一些挑战。讨论部分为老年友好型模式的发展提供了背景,并为其成功执行的部分必需因素提供了总结。本文随后审视了一系列老年友好型政策可能得以发展的关键领域,尤其聚焦于与影响中老年人口的各种不平等相关的议题。本文还强调了未来老年友好型工作的重要性,这项工作基于与试图提升城市人口生活的不同运动进行协作。本文结论呼吁进行一项更具包容性的、承认老龄化经历多样性的老年友好型运动。

Suggested Citation

  • Chris Phillipson & Tine Buffel, 2020. "Developing Age‐friendly Cities: Policy Opportunities and Challenges," Journal of Elder Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 1(1), pages 137-154, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:eldpol:v:1:y:2020:i:1:p:137-154
    DOI: 10.18278/jep.1.1.7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.18278/jep.1.1.7
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18278/jep.1.1.7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joost Van Hoof & Jan K. Kazak & Jolanta M. Perek-Białas & Sebastiaan T. M. Peek, 2018. "The Challenges of Urban Ageing: Making Cities Age-Friendly in Europe," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-17, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mingyu Sun & Leizi Min & Na Xu & Lei Huang & Xuemei Li, 2021. "The Effect of Exercise Intervention on Reducing the Fall Risk in Older Adults: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-14, November.
    2. Katrien Luijkx & Leonieke van Boekel & Meriam Janssen & Marjolein Verbiest & Annerieke Stoop, 2020. "The Academic Collaborative Center Older Adults: A Description of Co-Creation between Science, Care Practice and Education with the Aim to Contribute to Person-Centered Care for Older Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Joost van Hoof & Helen Bennetts & Alana Hansen & Jan K. Kazak & Veronica Soebarto, 2019. "The Living Environment and Thermal Behaviours of Older South Australians: A Multi-Focus Group Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-19, March.
    4. Maša Filipovič Hrast & Richard Sendi & Boštjan Kerbler, 2023. "Person–Environment Fit in Urban Neighbourhoods in Slovenia: Challenges and Coping Strategies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-14, March.
    5. Frans Sengers & Alexander Peine, 2021. "Innovation Pathways for Age-Friendly Homes in Europe," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-25, January.
    6. Joost van Hoof & Hannah R. Marston, 2021. "Age-Friendly Cities and Communities: State of the Art and Future Perspectives," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-13, February.
    7. Jianbo Han & Edwin H. W. Chan & Esther H. K. Yung & Queena K. Qian & Patrick T. I. Lam, 2022. "A Policy Framework for Producing Age-Friendly Communities from the Perspective of Production of Space," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-23, February.
    8. Ivis García, 2024. "Understanding the Housing Preferences of Older Adults: Insights from a Study on Micro-Housing in Salt Lake City, U.S," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-20, February.
    9. Joost van Hoof & Jeroen Dikken & Willeke H. van Staalduinen & Suzan van der Pas & Rudy F. M. van den Hoven & Loes M. T. Hulsebosch-Janssen, 2022. "Towards a Better Understanding of the Sense of Safety and Security of Community-Dwelling Older Adults. The Case of the Age-Friendly City of The Hague," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-20, March.
    10. Izabela Kurtyka-Marcak & Maria Hełdak & Katarzyna Przybyła, 2019. "The Actual Demand for the Elimination of Architectural Barriers among Senior Citizens in Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-16, July.
    11. Mahnoosh Hassankhani & Mehdi Alidadi & Ayyoob Sharifi & Abolghasem Azhdari, 2021. "Smart City and Crisis Management: Lessons for the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-18, July.
    12. Sabina Baraković & Jasmina Baraković Husić & Joost van Hoof & Ondrej Krejcar & Petra Maresova & Zahid Akhtar & Francisco Jose Melero, 2020. "Quality of Life Framework for Personalised Ageing: A Systematic Review of ICT Solutions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-20, April.
    13. Chunmei Zhang & Jun Yang, 2023. "Evaluation of the Quality of the Age-Friendly Environment in Liaoning Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-13, November.
    14. Miao Fu & Lucang Wang & Qianguo Li, 2024. "How Does the Spatial Structure of Urban Agglomerations Affect the Spatiotemporal Evolution of Population Aging?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-24, April.
    15. María Ángeles Molina-Martínez & Sara Marsillas & María Sánchez-Román & Elena del Barrio, 2022. "Friendly Residential Environments and Subjective Well-Being in Older People with and without Help Needs," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-14, November.
    16. Kazushige Ide & Seungwon Jeong & Taishi Tsuji & Ryota Watanabe & Yasuhiro Miyaguni & Hirotaka Nakamura & Miyako Kimura & Katsunori Kondo, 2022. "Suggesting Indicators of Age-Friendly City: Social Participation and Happiness, an Ecological Study from the JAGES," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-12, April.
    17. Hannah R. Marston & Joost van Hoof, 2019. "“Who Doesn’t Think about Technology When Designing Urban Environments for Older People?” A Case Study Approach to a Proposed Extension of the WHO’s Age-Friendly Cities Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-35, September.
    18. Katja M. Rusinovic & Marianne E. van Bochove & Suzanna Koops-Boelaars & Zsuzsu K.C.T. Tavy & Joost van Hoof, 2020. "Towards Responsible Rebellion: How Founders Deal with Challenges in Establishing and Governing Innovative Living Arrangements for Older People," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-15, August.
    19. Elisa Pozo Menéndez & Ester Higueras García, 2022. "Best Practices from Eight European Dementia-Friendly Study Cases of Innovation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-28, October.
    20. Mihaela Ghența & Aniela Matei & Luise Mladen-Macovei & Elen-Silvana Bobârnat, 2022. "Factors Associated with the Participation of Older Adults in Cultural and Sports Activities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-22, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:eldpol:v:1:y:2020:i:1:p:137-154. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.