IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/coacre/v5y1989i2p468-471.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Discussion of “Proof that in an efficient market, event studies can provide no systematic guidance for revision of accounting standards and disclosure policy for the purpose of maximizing shareholder wealthâ€

Author

Listed:
  • KATHLEEN T. McGAHRAN

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • KATHLEEN T. McGAHRAN, 1989. "Discussion of “Proof that in an efficient market, event studies can provide no systematic guidance for revision of accounting standards and disclosure policy for the purpose of maximizing shareholde," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 5(2), pages 468-471, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:coacre:v:5:y:1989:i:2:p:468-471
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.1989.tb00716.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.1989.tb00716.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1911-3846.1989.tb00716.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shyam Sunder, 1989. "Proof that in an efficient market, event studies can provide no systematic guidance for revision of accounting standards and disclosure policy for the purpose of maximizing shareholder wealth," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 5(2), pages 452-460, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gao, Pingyang, 2008. "Disclosure Quality, Cost of Capital, and Investors’ Welfare," MPRA Paper 9478, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Jun 2008.
    2. Nicholas Dopuch, 1989. "Discussion of “Proof that in an efficient market, event studies can provide no systematic guidance for revision of accounting standards and disclosure policy for the purpose of maximizing shareholde," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 5(2), pages 461-467, March.
    3. Pingyang Gao & Pierre Jinghong Liang, 2013. "Informational Feedback, Adverse Selection, and Optimal Disclosure Policy," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(5), pages 1133-1158, December.
    4. Philip Bond & Itay Goldstein & Edward Simpson Prescott, 2006. "Market-based regulation and the informational content of prices," Working Paper 06-12, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond.
    5. Ronald A. Dye & S. Sridhar, 2002. "Resource Allocation Effects of Price Reactions to Disclosures," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3), pages 385-410, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:coacre:v:5:y:1989:i:2:p:468-471. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1911-3846 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.