IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/coacre/v36y2019i4p2113-2141.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

It Goes without Saying: The Effects of Intrinsic Motivational Orientation, Leadership Emphasis of Intrinsic Goals, and Audit Issue Ambiguity on Speaking Up

Author

Listed:
  • Kathryn Kadous
  • Chad A. Proell
  • Jay Rich
  • Yuepin (Daniel) Zhou

Abstract

Regulation requires auditors to raise significant audit issues and concerns to the attention of audit engagement leadership and requires leadership to encourage such communication. This research demonstrates, using an experiment and a survey, that audit team members' willingness to speak up about such issues is associated with their intrinsic motivational orientation. Based on this result, we test whether audit leadership can leverage this relationship to increase speaking up, particularly when audit issues are more ambiguous, by emphasizing intrinsic goals. Results across three additional experiments indicate that auditors whose leaders emphasize intrinsic goals, whether directly or through tone at the top and firm culture, are more likely to speak up than are other auditors. We also find that auditors are more likely to speak up when an audit issue is less versus more ambiguous. We conclude that leadership can fulfill their obligation to encourage upward communication by emphasizing intrinsic versus extrinsic goals, regardless of the level of ambiguity surrounding the audit issue. Les répercussions de l'orientation des motivations intrinsèques, de l'insistance des responsables sur les buts intrinsèques et de l'ambiguïté des problèmes d'audit sur le choix de signaler ces problèmes La réglementation exige des auditeurs qu'ils portent les préoccupations et les problèmes soulevés par l'audit à l'attention des responsables de la mission d'audit et que ces responsables les encouragent à le faire. Les auteurs démontrent, à l'aide d'une expérience et d'un sondage, que la propension des membres de l’équipe d'audit à signaler ces problèmes est associée à l'orientation de leurs motivations intrinsèques. Étant donné ce constat, ils vérifient si les responsables de l'audit peuvent exploiter cette relation de manière à cultiver cette attitude d'ouverture, en particulier lorsque les problèmes d'audit sont plus ambigus, en mettant l'accent sur les buts intrinsèques. Les résultats de trois expériences supplémentaires indiquent que les auditeurs relevant de responsables qui mettent l'accent sur les buts intrinsèques, que ce soit directement ou par l'exemple et la culture d'entreprise, sont davantage susceptibles que les autres auditeurs de signaler les problèmes d'audit. Les auteurs constatent également que les auditeurs tendent plus souvent à signaler un problème d'audit lorsque le degré d'ambiguïté qui y est associé est moindre. Les auteurs concluent que les responsables peuvent s'acquitter de leur obligation d'encourager les auditeurs à signaler les problèmes d'audit à leurs supérieurs en mettant l'accent sur les buts intrinsèques plutôt que les buts extrinsèques, peu importe le degré d'ambiguïté associé au problème d'audit.

Suggested Citation

  • Kathryn Kadous & Chad A. Proell & Jay Rich & Yuepin (Daniel) Zhou, 2019. "It Goes without Saying: The Effects of Intrinsic Motivational Orientation, Leadership Emphasis of Intrinsic Goals, and Audit Issue Ambiguity on Speaking Up," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(4), pages 2113-2141, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:coacre:v:36:y:2019:i:4:p:2113-2141
    DOI: 10.1111/1911-3846.12500
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12500
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1911-3846.12500?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kathryn Kadous & Yuepin (Daniel) Zhou, 2019. "How Does Intrinsic Motivation Improve Auditor Judgment in Complex Audit Tasks?," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(1), pages 108-131, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Laurence Daoust & Bertrand Malsch, 2020. "When the Client Is A Former Auditor: Auditees' Expert Knowledge and Social Capital as Threats to Staff Auditors' Operational Independence†," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(3), pages 1333-1369, September.
    2. Dierynck, Bart & Kadous, Kathryn & Peters, Christian P. H., 2023. "Learning in the auditing profession: A framework and future directions," Other publications TiSEM eb74c8e4-bc4a-4b71-b88a-4, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    3. Carrera, Nieves & Mareque, Mercedes, 2023. "Does gender affect qualifying decisions? Evidence from public sector audits," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    4. Griffith, Emily E. & Kadous, Kathryn & Proell, Chad A., 2020. "Friends in low places: How peer advice and expected leadership feedback affect staff auditors’ willingness to speak up," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ruhnke, Klaus, 2023. "Empirical research frameworks in a changing world: The case of audit data analytics," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    2. Jose Joaquin Pozo-Antúnez & Horacio Molina-Sánchez & Antonio Ariza-Montes & Francisco Fernández-Navarro, 2021. "Promoting work Engagement in the Accounting Profession: a Machine Learning Approach," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 157(2), pages 653-670, September.
    3. Dzhumashev, Ratbek & Levaggi, Rosella & Menoncin, Francesco, 2023. "Optimal tax enforcement with productive public inputs," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    4. Bustos-Contell, Elisabeth & Porcuna-Enguix, Luis & Serrano-Madrid, José & Labatut-Serer, Gregorio, 2022. "Female audit team leaders and audit effort," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 324-331.
    5. Peters, Christian P. H., 2023. "The microfoundations of audit quality," Other publications TiSEM 6a2b12a5-6060-4544-883b-e, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    6. Sanaz Aghazadeh & Yoon Ju Kang & Marietta Peytcheva, 2023. "Auditors’ scepticism in response to audit committee oversight behaviour," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(2), pages 2013-2034, June.
    7. Iryna Alves & Miguel Limão & Sofia M. Lourenço, 2024. "Work Overload, Work–Life Balance and Auditors' Turnover Intention: The Moderating Role of Motivation," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 34(1), pages 4-28, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:coacre:v:36:y:2019:i:4:p:2113-2141. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1911-3846 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.