Author
Listed:
- Dane M. Christensen
- Keith L. Jones
- David G. Kenchington
Abstract
We investigate whether attitudes toward gambling help explain the occurrence of intentional misreporting. Similar to gambling, some financial reporting choices involve taking deliberate, speculative risks. We predict that in places where gambling is more socially acceptable, managers will be more likely to take financial reporting risks that increase the likelihood the financial statements will need to be restated. To test this prediction, we exploit geographic variation in local gambling attitudes and find that restatements due to intentional misreporting are more common in areas where gambling is more socially acceptable. This association is even stronger in situations where management is under greater pressure to misreport, including when the firm is close to meeting a performance benchmark, experiencing poor financial performance, or under investment‐related pressure. Furthermore, these results are robust to numerous tests to address omitted variables and endogeneity. Collectively, these findings suggest gambling attitudes help explain the incidence of intentional misreporting. Les auteurs se demandent si les attitudes à l’égard du jeu contribuent à expliquer l'occurrence de la falsification intentionnelle de l'information financière. En matière d'information financière, certains choix apparentés au jeu font intervenir la prise intentionnelle de risques spéculatifs. Selon la prédiction des auteurs, là où le jeu est davantage acceptable socialement, les gestionnaires seront plus susceptibles de prendre, au chapitre de l'information financière, des risques augmentant la probabilité qu'un retraitement des états financiers s'impose. Pour vérifier cette prédiction, les auteurs exploitent la fluctuation des attitudes à l’égard du jeu selon la situation géographique et constatent que les retraitements exigés par la falsification intentionnelle de l'information financière sont plus courants là où le jeu est davantage acceptable socialement. Cette association est même plus marquée encore lorsque les gestionnaires sont plus fortement incités à falsifier l'information financière, notamment si la société est sur le point d'atteindre un indicateur de performance ou d'enregistrer une piètre performance, ou qu'elle est soumise à des pressions liées à l'investissement. En outre, ces résultats résistent à de nombreux tests visant à prendre en compte les variables omises et à traiter l'endogénéité. Dans l'ensemble, ces observations semblent indiquer que les attitudes à l’égard du jeu contribuent à expliquer l'incidence de la falsification intentionnelle de l'information financière.
Suggested Citation
Dane M. Christensen & Keith L. Jones & David G. Kenchington, 2018.
"Gambling Attitudes and Financial Misreporting,"
Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(3), pages 1229-1261, September.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:coacre:v:35:y:2018:i:3:p:1229-1261
DOI: 10.1111/1911-3846.12322
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:coacre:v:35:y:2018:i:3:p:1229-1261. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1911-3846 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.