IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/coacre/v35y2018i1p464-493.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lenders’ Response to Peer and Customer Restatements

Author

Listed:
  • Rebecca Files
  • Umit G. Gurun

Abstract

We investigate whether restatements announced by economically related firms influence the contract terms a borrower receives from lenders. A restatement by a major customer firm increases the loan spread of a borrower by 11 basis points, on average. The contagion effects of customer restatements are higher (45 basis points) when a borrower's switching costs are high. Restatements by peer firms in the same industry also increase a borrower's loan spread, and this increase occurs regardless of restatement severity. Moreover, the sensitivity of loan spread to peer restatements is significantly greater when the restating peer firms are also in the bank's lending portfolio, suggesting that a lender's personal experience with restatements in an industry makes it more attuned to the potential implications of these restatements for the borrowing firm. Finally, our results suggest that lenders utilize information from peer restatements to anticipate future restatements by the borrowing firm. Les auteurs se demandent si les retraitements des états financiers annoncés par des sociétés ayant un lien économique avec une société emprunteuse influent sur les conditions contractuelles que cette dernière obtient des prêteurs. Un retraitement des états financiers d'une importante société cliente accroît le différentiel de taux d'une société emprunteuse de 11 points de base, en moyenne. Les effets de contagion des retraitements des états financiers de sociétés clientes sont plus importants (45 points de base) lorsque les coûts d'un changement de client sont élevés pour la société emprunteuse. Les retraitements des états financiers de sociétés comparables exerçant leurs activités dans le même secteur entraînent également une hausse du différentiel de taux d'une société emprunteuse, et cela peu importe la gravité des problèmes que visent à corriger les retraitements. De plus, la sensibilité du différentiel de taux aux retraitements des états financiers de sociétés comparables est beaucoup plus grande lorsque les sociétés comparables procédant à ces retraitements figurent aussi dans le portefeuille de prêts de la banque, ce qui laisse croire que l'expérience du prêteur en matière de retraitements dans un secteur d'activité accroît l'attention qu'il porte aux conséquences potentielles de ces retraitements pour la société emprunteuse. Enfin, les résultats de l’étude semblent indiquer que les prêteurs utilisent l'information relative aux retraitements des états financiers des sociétés comparables pour anticiper les retraitements ultérieurs des états financiers de la société emprunteuse.

Suggested Citation

  • Rebecca Files & Umit G. Gurun, 2018. "Lenders’ Response to Peer and Customer Restatements," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(1), pages 464-493, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:coacre:v:35:y:2018:i:1:p:464-493
    DOI: 10.1111/1911-3846.12374
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12374
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1911-3846.12374?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cheng Yin & Xin Cheng & Yinan Yang & Dan Palmon, 2021. "Do Corporate Frauds Distort Suppliers’ Investment Decisions?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 172(1), pages 115-132, August.
    2. Li, Tongxia & Lu, Chun & Wang, Hui, 2023. "Stakeholder orientation and trade credit: Evidence from a natural experiment," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 15-34.
    3. Yingying Xin & Xiao Zeng & Zhengying Luo, 2022. "Customers' tone in MD&A disclosure and suppliers' inventory efficiency: Evidence from China," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(8), pages 3833-3853, December.
    4. Pan, Jianping & Yu, Manjiao & Liu, Jiayuan & Fan, Rui, 2020. "Customer concentration and corporate innovation: Evidence from China," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    5. Pappas, Kostas & Walsh, Eamonn & Xu, Alice Liang, 2019. "Real earnings management and loan contract terms," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 51(4), pages 373-401.
    6. Ruirui Fang & Nan Hu & Peng Liang & Ling Liu, 2023. "Cross‐market information transmission along the supply chain network," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(7), pages 2227-2244, July.
    7. Wang, Jiaxin & Wu, Zhifeng & Yuan, Xue & Song, Zilong, 2024. "Peer governance effects of information security breaches," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    8. Ma, Xiaofang & Wang, Wenming & Wu, Jiangang & Zhang, Wenlan, 2020. "Corporate customer concentration and stock price crash risk," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    9. Cao, Shijiao & Wang, Jianqiong & Zhou, Jianan, 2022. "Pricing like things alike: The role of financial statement comparability in bond pricing," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 428-447.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:coacre:v:35:y:2018:i:1:p:464-493. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1911-3846 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.