IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/coacre/v33y2016i3p961-988.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accounting Conservatism and Performance Covenants: A Signaling Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Jeffrey L. Callen
  • Feng Chen
  • Yiwei Dou
  • Baohua Xin

Abstract

This study examines the relation between performance covenants in private debt contracting and conservative accounting under adverse selection. We find that under severe adverse selection (i.e., high information asymmetry), accounting conservatism and performance covenants act as complements to signal that the borrower is unlikely to appropriate wealth from the lender. No such relation obtains in a low information asymmetry regime. We further show that in the high information asymmetry regime, borrowers with high levels of conservatism and tight performance covenants generally enjoy lower interest rate spreads than borrowers with low levels of conservatism and loose performance covenants. Consistent with our signaling theory, in the high information asymmetry regime, borrowers with high levels of conservatism and tight performance covenants are less likely to make abnormal payouts to shareholders. Our empirical results are robust to alternative measures of conservatism and covenant restrictiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeffrey L. Callen & Feng Chen & Yiwei Dou & Baohua Xin, 2016. "Accounting Conservatism and Performance Covenants: A Signaling Approach," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(3), pages 961-988, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:coacre:v:33:y:2016:i:3:p:961-988
    DOI: 10.1111/1911-3846.12208
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12208
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1911-3846.12208?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Urooj Khan & Alvis K. Lo, 2019. "Bank Lending Standards and Borrower Accounting Conservatism," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(11), pages 5337-5359, November.
    2. Pappas, Kostas & Walsh, Eamonn & Xu, Alice Liang, 2019. "Real earnings management and loan contract terms," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 51(4), pages 373-401.
    3. Feng Chen & Qingyuan Li & Li Xu, 2021. "Universal demand laws and the monitoring demand for accounting conservatism," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(7-8), pages 1246-1289, July.
    4. Lu, Tong & Ruan, Lijun, 2024. "Coordination and Conservatism," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    5. Shai Levi & Benjamin Segal & Dan Segal, 2021. "Does fiduciary duty to creditors reduce debt covenant violation avoidance behavior?," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(5-6), pages 929-953, May.
    6. Shankar Shaw, Tara & Raithatha, Mehul & Krishnan, Gopal V. & Cordeiro, James J., 2021. "Did mandatory CSR compliance impact accounting Conservatism? Evidence from the Indian Companies Act 2013," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(3).
    7. Adamu Pantamee Abdurrahman & Shafi Mohamad & Ooi Chee Keong & Syed Ehsanullah, 2020. "Debt Covenants and Accounting Conservatism," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 11(4), pages 537-545, July.
    8. Jacobo Gomez-Conde & Ernesto Lopez-Valeiras & Fabricia Silva Rosa & Rogério João Lunkes, 2023. "The effect of management control systems in managing the unknown: Does the market appreciate the breadth of vision?," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(8), pages 2769-2795, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:coacre:v:33:y:2016:i:3:p:961-988. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1911-3846 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.